Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33514774›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Improvement of gastrointestinal discomfort and inflammatory status by a synbiotic in middle-aged adults: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Audrey M Neyrinck, Julie Rodriguez, Bernard Taminiau, Camille Amadieu, Florent Herpin, François-André Allaert, Patrice D Cani, Georges Daube, Laure B Bindels, Nathalie M Delzenne

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The role of probiotic supplementation in reducingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Audrey M NeyrinckMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier, Box B1.73.11, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Julie RodriguezMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier, Box B1.73.11, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard TaminiauFundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Camille AmadieuMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier, Box B1.73.11, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Florent HerpinCEN Nutriment, CEN Group, Dijon, France.
François-André AllaertCEN Nutriment, CEN Group, Dijon, France.
Patrice D CaniMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier, Box B1.73.11, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Georges DaubeFundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Laure B BindelsMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier, Box B1.73.11, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Nathalie M DelzenneMetabolism and Nutrition Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier, Box B1.73.11, 1200, Brussels, Belgium. nathalie.delzenne@uclouvain.be.
UCLouvain · BEUniversity of Liège · BEWalloon Excellence in Lifesciences and Biotechnology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies suggest that microbial alterations (dysbiosis) are intimately linked to chronic inflammation occurring upon aging. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential interest of a synbiotic approach (co-administration of a probiotic bacteria and a prebiotic dietary fibre) to improve gastrointestinal wellness and inflammatory markers in middle-aged people. Middle-aged subjects were randomized to take synbiotic (Bifidobacterium animalis lactis and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS)) or placebo for 30 days. Stool frequency and consistency were improved in both placebo and synbiotic-treated volunteers while the synbiotic treatment significantly decreased the number of days with abdominal discomfort. Synbiotic treatment had no impact on mood dimensions, quality of life scores or the overall composition of the gut microbiota (16S rRNA gene sequencing of DNA extracted from stool). Importantly, plasma proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-17a and interferon-gamma (IFNγ)) were significantly lower after 30 days of synbiotic supplementation. This effect appears to be independent of the gut barrier function. This study demonstrates that a combination of B. animalis lactis and the well-known prebiotic FOS could be a promising synbiotic strategy to decrease inflammatory status with improvement of gut disorders in middle-aged people.

Indexed as

AgedAgingBifidobacterium animalisBiomarkersCytokinesDouble-Blind MethodFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSynbioticsBiomarkersCytokines

Identifiers

PMID33514774
PMCPMC7846804
OpenAlexW3121880777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.