Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33514656›Full record

ArticleLife science alliance2021

A novel

Robert A Player, Ellen R Forsyth, Kathleen J Verratti, David W Mohr, Alan F Scott, Christopher E Bradburne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life science alliance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fine-scale recombination rates inferred using the canFam4 assembly are strongly correlated with previous maps of dog recombination.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review of Molecular Technologies for Investigating Canine Cancer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Australasian dingo archetype:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert A PlayerAsymmetric Operations Sector, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5872-259X
Ellen R ForsythAsymmetric Operations Sector, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
Kathleen J VerrattiAsymmetric Operations Sector, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA.
David W MohrMcKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alan F ScottMcKusick-Nathans Department of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9706-7839
Christopher E BradburneAsymmetric Operations Sector, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA chris.bradburne@jhuapl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4968-8208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference genome fidelity is critically important for genome wide association studies, yet most vary widely from the study population. A typical whole genome sequencing approach implies short-read technologies resulting in fragmented assemblies with regions of ambiguity. Further information is lost by economic necessity when genotyping populations, as lower resolution technologies such as genotyping arrays are commonly used. Here, we present a phased reference genome for

Indexed as

GenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsAnimalsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansWhole Genome SequencingWolves

Identifiers

PMID33514656
PMCPMC7898556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.