Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33514620›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2021

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for forgotten and retained stent in renal allograft recipient: an interesting case report and lessons learnt.

Shanawaz Alam, Neelakandan Ramasamy, Chandru Thirunavukkarasu, Natarajan Kumaresan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanawaz AlamDepartment of Urology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3004-0164
Neelakandan RamasamyDepartment of Urology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chandru ThirunavukkarasuDepartment of Urology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Natarajan KumaresanDepartment of Urology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India drknatarajan@yahoo.co.in.
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complications after renal allograft transplantation are not so uncommon. Most complications are related to graft rejection, immune-suppressive drug toxicity and the operative procedure. Stents are placed after a transplant to prevent urine leak at the site of ureteric reimplantation, to facilitate an early healing in immune-suppressed individuals and to prevent obstruction at the site of ureteral anastomosis. We report a case of a renal allograft recipient with a forgotten ureteral double J stent. where the stent remained in situ for more than 4 years and further complicated by encrustation and stone formation at both the bladder and renal pelvic ends. The stone over the bladder coil was removed by holmium laser cystolithotripsy while the encrusted renal pelvic coil was removed by percutaneous approach. This case is presented for its rarity and also to emphasise on the need for maintenance of a stent register in order to ensure avoidance of such preventable complications.

Indexed as

AdultAllograftsDevice RemovalHumansKidney TransplantationLasers, Solid-StateMaleNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousStentsTransplant RecipientsTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder CalculiUrinary Calculirenal transplantationurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID33514620
PMCPMC7849896
OpenAlexW3121446872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.