ArticleBMJ global health2021
Abortion metrics: a scoping review of abortion measures and indicators.
Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Women's Satisfaction With Quality of Abortion Care, Associated Factors, and Barriers in Public Health Facilities of South Gondar Zone, Ethiopia: A Mixed Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- "It's My Dark Secret": A Qualitative Study on the Abortion Experiences of US Active-Duty Servicewomen.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2026Article
- The Role of Prenatal Care in Fetal and Infant Development in Brazil: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- [Design and validation of a questionnaire to measure access to and quality of abortion services in Argentina].Salud colectiva · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessing post-abortion care using the WHO quality of care framework for maternal and newborn health: a cross-sectional study in two African hospitals in humanitarian settings.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Development of indicators to measure health system capacity for quality abortion care in 10 countries: a rapid assessment of a measurement framework and indicators.BMJ public health · 2024Article
- Quality of care from the perspective of people obtaining abortion: a qualitative study in four countries.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Toward a Standard Measure of Abortion Service Quality-A Stakeholder First Approach.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Article
- Quality of information offered to women by drug sellers providing medical abortion in Nigeria: Evidence from providers and their clients.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Article
- How can patient experience of abortion care be improved? Evidence from the SACHA study.Women's health (London, England)Article
- Person-centered maternity care and satisfaction with post-abortion care: A facility-based cross-sectional survey in Northern Uganda.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Consensus is lacking on the most appropriate indicators to document progress in safe abortion at programmatic and country level. We conducted a scoping review to provide an extensive summary of abortion indicators used over 10 years (2008-2018) to inform the debate on how progress in the provision and access to abortion care can be best captured. Documents were identified in PubMed and Popline and supplemented by materials identified on major non-governmental organisation websites. We screened 1999 abstracts and seven additional relevant documents. Ultimately, we extracted information on 792 indicators from 142 documents. Using a conceptual framework developed inductively, we grouped indicators into seven domains (social and policy context, abortion access and availability, abortion prevalence and incidence, abortion care, abortion outcomes, abortion impact and characteristics of women) and 40 subdomains. Indicators of access and availability and of the provision of abortion care were the most common. Indicators of outcomes were fewer and focused on physical health, with few measures of psychological well-being and no measures of quality of life or functioning. Similarly, there were few indicators attempting to measure the context, including beliefs and social attitudes at the population level. Most indicators used special studies either in facilities or at population level. The list of indicators (in online supplemental appendix) is an extensive resource for the design of monitoring and evaluation plans of abortion programmes. The large number indicators, many specific to one source only and with similar concepts measured in a multitude of ways, suggest the need for standardisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.