ArticleBMC biotechnology2021
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of clinically relevant alloantigenes in human primary T cells.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-Cas and Infectious Diseases: A Decade of Translational Advances in Molecular Biotechnology.Biochemical genetics · 2026Review
- The TCR in CAR T cell therapy: use it or lose it?Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Allogeneic CRISPR-Engineered CAR-T Cells Drive Potent Antitumor Activity in Solid Tumors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Recent applications, future perspectives, and limitations of the CRISPR-Cas system.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Deciphering the role of MFGE8 in lactation using CRISPR-CAS9 based gene editing in Buffalo mammary epithelial cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Scalable and cost-effective CAR-T exosome therapies: challenges and future directions.Immunotherapy · 2025Review
- Precise measurement of CRISPR genome editing outcomes through single-cell DNA sequencing.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- CAR-engineered NK cells versus CAR T cells in treatment of glioblastoma; strength and flaws.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Unlocking the potential of engineered immune cell therapy for solid tumors.Nature communications · 2025Article
- CAR-γδ T cells: a new paradigm of programmable innate immune sentinels and their systemic applications in cancer and beyond.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Engineering the next generation of CAR T- cells: precision modifications, logic gates and universal strategies to overcome exhaustion and tumor resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- An aptamer-mediated base editing platform for simultaneous knockin and multiple gene knockout for allogeneic CAR-T cells generation.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
- Exploring treatment options in cancer: Tumor treatment strategies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- The construction of modular universal chimeric antigen receptor T (MU-CAR-T) cells by covalent linkage of allogeneic T cells and various antibody fragments.Molecular cancer · 2024Article
- Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Increasing Gene Editing Efficiency via CRISPR/Cas9- or Cas12a-Mediated Knock-In in Primary Human T Cells.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Choosing T-cell sources determines CAR-T cell activity in neuroblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Current advances in experimental and computational approaches to enhance CAR T cell manufacturing protocols and improve clinical efficacy.Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Challenges and solutions for therapeutic TCR-based agents.Immunological reviews · 2023Review
- Selection of highly responsive T cell receptors by an analysis combining the expression of multiple markers.Cancer science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ability of CRISPR/Cas9 to mutate any desired genomic locus is being increasingly explored in the emerging area of cancer immunotherapy. In this respect, current efforts are mostly focused on the use of autologous (i.e. patient-derived) T cells. The autologous approach, however, has drawbacks in terms of manufacturing time, cost, feasibility and scalability that can affect therapeutic outcome or wider clinical application. The use of allogeneic T cells from healthy donors may overcome these limitations. For this strategy to work, the endogenous T cell receptor (TCR) needs to be knocked out in order to reduce off-tumor, graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). Furthermore, CD52 may be knocked out in the donor T cells, since this leaves them resistant to the commonly used anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody lymphodepletion regimen aiming to suppress rejection of the infused T cells by the recipient. Despite the great prospect, genetic manipulation of human T cells remains challenging, in particular how to deliver the engineering reagents: virus-mediated delivery entails the inherent risk of altering cancer gene expression by the genomically integrated CRISPR/Cas9. This is avoided by delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 as ribonucleoproteins, which, however, are fragile and technically demanding to produce. Electroporation of CRISPR/Cas9 expression plasmids would bypass the above issues, as this approach is simple, the reagents are robust and easily produced and delivery is transient.
resultsHere, we tested knockout of either TCR or CD52 in human primary T cells, using electroporation of CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids. After validating the CRISPR/Cas9 constructs in human 293 T cells by Tracking of Indels by Decomposition (TIDE) and Indel Detection by Amplicon Analysis (IDAA) on-target genomic analysis, we evaluated their efficacy in primary T cells. Four days after electroporation with the constructs, genomic analysis revealed a knockout rate of 12-14% for the two genes, which translated into 7-8% of cells showing complete loss of surface expression of TCR and CD52 proteins, as determined by flow cytometry analysis.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that genomic knockout by electroporation of plasmids encoding CRISPR/Cas9 is technically feasible in human primary T cells, albeit at low efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.