ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021
Accuracy measures of 1.5-tesla MRI for the diagnosis of ACL, meniscus and articular knee cartilage damage and characteristics of false negative lesions: a level III prognostic study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased lateral posterior tibial slope and greater tibiofemoral rotation are associated with a higher risk of lateral meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament injuries.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Double Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sign.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Age exerts differential effects on MRI misclassification for medial and lateral meniscal tears.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Return to sport after ACL reconstruction, meniscus and cartilage surgeries in professional soccer players: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery & related research · 2026Review
- Clinical evaluation of femoral head cartilage damage using 5-Tesla MRI T2-mapping sequence-based on pathological specimens.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of sagittal, coronal, and axial magnetic resonance imaging planes in diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal tears via a deep learning model: emphasizing the unexpected importance of the axial plane.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Risk factors for false positive and false negative MRI in diagnosing medial and lateral meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- Comparison between a Novel Knee Arthrometer and Simultaneous Stress Radiography for the Diagnosis of Complete and Partial Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Ankle Joint MRI-Comparison of Image Quality and Effect of Sports-Related Stress.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Preoperative diagnosis of knee cartilage, meniscal, and ligament injuries by magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023Article
- The Value of Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Subacromial Bursography for Rotator Cuff Tear in Elderly Patients with Shoulder Pain.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- MRI evaluation of meniscal anatomy: which parameters reach the best inter-observer concordance?La Radiologia medica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMRI is the most accurate imaging modality for diagnosing knee pathologies. However, there is uncertainty concerning factors predicting false negative MRI, such as meniscal tear patterns as well as patient factors. The aims of this study were to report 1.5-Tesla MRI accuracy of ACL, meniscus and articular cartilage damage and characterize false negative lesions.
methodsTwo hundred eighteen consecutive knee arthroscopies performed in our institution between 2013 and 2016 and their respective prospectively-collected MRI reports were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age > 15 years-old, primary arthroscopy, 1.5-Tesla MRI performed at the same institution, and time interval MRI-surgery < 6 months. Exclusion criteria were revision arthroscopy and arthroscopic-assisted fracture fixation or multiligament surgery. Accuracy measures and Kappa coefficients were calculated comparing the MRI diagnosis to the arthroscopic findings. Moreover, the arthroscopic findings of false negative MRI were compared to the findings of true positive MRI using the Fisher-exact test. Pearson correlation was used for testing the correlation between MRI accuracy and patient age.
resultsThe highest accuracy was observed in medial meniscus and in ACL findings. For the medial meniscus sensitivity, specificity, agreement, and Kappa coefficient were 77, 92, 86%, and 0.7, and for the ACL these measures were 82, 97, 87%, and 0.73. MRI accuracy was lower in the lateral meniscus and articular cartilage with Kappa coefficient 0.42 and 0.3, respectively. More specifically, short peripheral tears in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus were characteristic of false negative findings compared to true positive findings of the MRI (p < 0.01). MRI accuracy correlated negatively compared to arthroscopic findings with patient age for the medial meniscus (r = - 0.21, p = 0.002) and for articular cartilage damage (r = - 0.45, p < 0.001).
conclusion1.5-Tesla MRI will accurately diagnose ACL and medial meniscal tears and can reliably complete the diagnostic workup following physical examination, particularly in young adults. This modality however is not reliable for diagnosing short peripheral tears at the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and partial thickness articular cartilage lesion of the femoral condyles. For these lesions, definitive diagnosis may require cartilage-specific MRI sequences or direct arthroscopic evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.