ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021
Additivity of segregation cues in simulated cocktail-party listening.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Applications of Acoustics for Stored Product Insect Detection, Monitoring, and Management.Insects · 2021Article
- A test of model classes accounting for individual differences in the cocktail-party effect.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Release from Speech-on-Speech Masking: Additivity of Segregation Cues and Build-Up of Segregation.Trends in hearingArticle
- The Effects of Uncertainty in Level on Speech-on-Speech Masking.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An approach is borrowed from Measurement Theory [Krantz et al. (1971). Foundations of Measurement (Academic, New York), Vol. 1] to evaluate the interaction of voice fundamental frequency and spatial cues in the segregation of talkers in simulated cocktail-party listening. The goal is to find a mathematical expression whereby the combined effect of cues can be simply related to their individual effects. On each trial, the listener judged whether an interleaved sequence of four vowel triplets (heard over headphones) were spoken by the same (MMM) or different (FMF) talkers. The talkers had nominally different fundamental frequencies and spoke from nominally different locations (simulated using head-related transfer functions). Natural variation in these cues was simulated by adding a small, random perturbation to the nominal values independently for each vowel on each trial. Psychometric functions (PFs) relating d' performance to the difference in nominal values were obtained for the cues presented individually and in combination. The results revealed a synergistic interaction of cues wherein the PFs for cues presented in combination exceeded the simple vector sum of the PFs for the cues presented individually. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for possible emergent properties of cues affecting performance in simulated cocktail-party listening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.