Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33514127›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021

An evaluation framework for research platforms to advance cochlear implant/hearing aid technology: A case study with CCi-MOBILE.

Ram C M C Shekar, John H L Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ram C M C ShekarCochlear Implant Processing Laboratory, Center for Robust Speech Systems (CRSS-CILab), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA.
John H L HansenCochlear Implant Processing Laboratory, Center for Robust Speech Systems (CRSS-CILab), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA.ORCID s0000000313829929

Funding

CCI-Mobile: Signal Processing Advancements for Cochlear Implant Users in Naturalistic EnvironmentsR01DC016839 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI HANSEN, JOHN H.L., LITOVSKY, RUTH Y · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing aids (HAs) are advanced assistive hearing devices that perform sound processing to achieve acoustic to acoustic/electrical stimulation, thus enabling the prospects for hearing restoration and rehabilitation. Since commercial CIs/HAs are typically constrained by manufacturer design/production constraints, it is necessary for researchers to use research platforms (RPs) to advance algorithms and conduct investigational studies with CI/HA subjects. While previous CI/HA research platforms exist, no study has explored establishing a formal evaluation protocol for the operational safety and reliability of RPs. This study proposes a two-phase analysis and evaluation paradigm for RPs. In the acoustic phase 1 step, a signal processing acoustic space is explored in order to present a sampled set of audio input content to explore the safety of the resulting output electric/acoustic stimulation. In the parameter phase 2 step, the configurable space for realizable electrical stimulation pulses is determined, and overall stimulation reliability and safety are evaluated. The proposed protocol is applied and demonstrated using Costakis Cochlear Implant Mobile. Assessment protocol observations, results, and additional best practices for subsampling of the acoustic and parameter test spaces are discussed. The proposed analysis-evaluation protocol establishes a viable framework for assessing RP operational safety and reliability. Guidelines for adapting the proposed protocol to address variability in RP configuration due to experimental factors such as custom algorithms, stimulation techniques, and/or individualization are also considered.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsHearing AidsSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationElectric StimulationHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID33514127
PMCPMC7803384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.