ArticleJournal of proteome research2021
Enhancing Open Modification Searches via a Combined Approach Facilitated by Ursgal.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- PTMs_Closed_Search: Multiple Post-Translational Modification Closed Search Using Reduced Search Space and Transferred FDR.Proteomes · 2026Article
- Extracting informative glycan-specific ions from glycopeptide MS/MS spectra with GlyCounter.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Proteome-wide non-cleavable crosslink identification with MS Annika 3.0 reveals the structure of the C. elegans Box C/D complex.Communications chemistry · 2024Article
- Identification of structural and regulatory cell-shape determinants in Haloferax volcanii.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Multienzyme deep learning models improve peptide de novo sequencing by mass spectrometry proteomics.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- A peptidoform based proteomic strategy for studying functions of post-translational modifications.Proteomics · 2022Article
- Proteomic Sample Preparation and Data Analysis in Line with the Archaeal Proteome Project.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Comprehensive glycoproteomics shines new light on the complexity and extent of glycosylation in archaea.PLoS biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The identification of peptide sequences and their post-translational modifications (PTMs) is a crucial step in the analysis of bottom-up proteomics data. The recent development of open modification search (OMS) engines allows virtually all PTMs to be searched for. This not only increases the number of spectra that can be matched to peptides but also greatly advances the understanding of the biological roles of PTMs through the identification, and the thereby facilitated quantification, of peptidoforms (peptide sequences and their potential PTMs). Whereas the benefits of combining results from multiple protein database search engines have been previously established, similar approaches for OMS results have been missing so far. Here we compare and combine results from three different OMS engines, demonstrating an increase in peptide spectrum matches of 8-18%. The unification of search results furthermore allows for the combined downstream processing of search results, including the mapping to potential PTMs. Finally, we test for the ability of OMS engines to identify glycosylated peptides. The implementation of these engines in the Python framework Ursgal facilitates the straightforward application of the OMS with unified parameters and results files, thereby enabling yet unmatched high-throughput, large-scale data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.