Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513988›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

COVID-19 Impact on Diagnostic Innovations: Emerging Trends and Implications.

Anne O Oyewole, Lucy Barrass, Emily G Robertson, James Woltmann, Hannah O'Keefe, Harsimran Sarpal, Kim Dangova, Catherine Richmond, Dawn Craig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in the Military during the Early Phase of the Pandemic-A Systematic Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne O OyewoleNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1311-1485
Lucy BarrassNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6557-1523
Emily G RobertsonNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6045-1450
James WoltmannNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.
Hannah O'KeefeNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.
Harsimran SarpalNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.
Kim DangovaNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.
Catherine RichmondNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2940-5197
Dawn CraigNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE4 5TG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5808-0096

Funding

National Institute for Health Research HSRIC-2016-10009/Innovation Observatory
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic testing remains the backbone of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response, supporting containment efforts to mitigate the outbreak. The severity of this crisis and increasing capacity issues associated with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based testing, accelerated the development of diagnostic solutions to meet demands for mass testing. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory is the national horizon scanning organization in England. Since March, the Innovation Observatory has applied advanced horizon scanning methodologies and tools to compile a diagnostic landscape, based upon data captured for molecular (MDx) and immunological (IDx) based diagnostics (commercialized/in development), for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. In total we identified and tracked 1608 diagnostics, produced by 1045 developers across 54 countries. Our dataset shows the speed and scale in which diagnostics were produced and provides insights into key periods of development and shifts in trends between MDx and IDx solutions as the pandemic progressed. Stakeholders worldwide required timely and detailed intelligence to respond to major challenges, including testing capacity and regulatory issues. Our intelligence assisted UK stakeholders with assessing priorities and mitigation options throughout the pandemic. Here we present the global evolution of diagnostic innovations devised to meet changing needs, their regulation and trends across geographical regions, providing invaluable insights into the complexity of the COVID-19 phenomena.

Indexed as

COVID-19diagnostic testshorizon scanningimmunoassaysIVDsmolecular assaysrapid diagnostic testsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33513988
PMCPMC7912626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.