Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513972›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Nurse and Nursing Students´ Opinions and Perceptions of Enteral Nutrition by Nasogastric Tube in Palliative Care.

Eduardo Sánchez-Sánchez, Guillermo Ramírez-Vargas, Alicia Peinado-Canas, Francisco Martín-Estrada, Jara Díaz-Jimenez, Francisco Javier Ordonez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eduardo Sánchez-SánchezPunta de Europa Hospital, Algeciras, 11207 Cádiz, Spain.
Guillermo Ramírez-VargasPunta de Europa Hospital, Algeciras, 11207 Cádiz, Spain.
Alicia Peinado-CanasPunta de Europa Hospital, Algeciras, 11207 Cádiz, Spain.
Francisco Martín-EstradaPunta de Europa Hospital, Algeciras, 11207 Cádiz, Spain.
Jara Díaz-JimenezFaculty of Education Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain.
Francisco Javier OrdonezHuman Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of Cadiz, Plaza Fragela s/n, 11003 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0191-503X
Universidad de Cádiz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that nursing staff play a key role in palliative care (PC). The use of Nasogastric tubes (NG tubes) for Enteral Nutrition (EN) administration is still controversial in patients who receive PC. The aim of this study was to describe nurses' and nursing students´ opinions and perceptions about EN using NG tubes in adult patients in palliative care. To achieve this goal, a cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. A self-administered, semi-structured questionnaire intended for nurses and nursing students was used. Data was descriptively and inferentially analyzed using a chi-square test to determine the differential frequency of responses. In addition, a multivariate logistic regression model was also conducted. A total of 511 participants completed the questionnaire. Among them, nursing staff represented 74.9% (

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionIntubation, GastrointestinalPalliative CareStudents, NursingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusPerceptionSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesArtificial NutritionEnteral Nutritionnasogastric tubepalliative CareTube Feeding

Identifiers

PMID33513972
PMCPMC7911468
OpenAlexW3124638424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.