Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513892›Full record

ReviewMembranes2021

Multitarget Approach to Cardiogenic Shock after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) and Beyond.

Federico Pappalardo, Giulia Malara, Andrea Montisci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Membranes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Federico PappalardoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS ISMETT, UPMC Italy, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Giulia MalaraCardiothoracic Center, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, 20149 Milan, Italy.
Andrea MontisciCardiothoracic Center, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, 20149 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-399X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction is associated with high mortality, substantially unchanged for the previous 20 years. Several approaches have been sought to achieve a therapeutic breakthrough, from myocardial revascularization strategies to the use of mechanical circulatory support. Many issues are, as yet, unresolved. Systemic inflammation seems to play a key role but is still lacking in effective therapies, and is potentially compounded by the death spiral of hypoperfusion and/or artificial devices. In this review, a multitarget approach to cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction is proposed.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctioncardiogenic shockextracorporeal life support

Identifiers

PMID33513892
PMCPMC7911652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.