Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513855›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Survival Analysis of 3 Different Age Groups and Prognostic Factors among 402 Patients with Skeletal High-Grade Osteosarcoma. Real World Data from a Single Tertiary Sarcoma Center.

Richard E Evenhuis, Ibtissam Acem, Anja J Rueten-Budde, Diederik S A Karis, Marta Fiocco, Desiree M J Dorleijn, Frank M Speetjens, Jakob Anninga, Hans Gelderblom, Michiel A J van de Sande

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard E EvenhuisDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6022-7096
Ibtissam AcemDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8042-9856
Anja J Rueten-BuddeDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Section Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Mathematical Institute Leiden University, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-8565
Diederik S A KarisDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marta FioccoDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Section Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Mathematical Institute Leiden University, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Desiree M J DorleijnDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Frank M SpeetjensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jakob AnningaPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3720AC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hans GelderblomDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-8636
Michiel A J van de SandeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9156-7656
Leiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NLPrincess Máxima Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age is a known prognostic factor for many sarcoma subtypes, however in the literature there are limited data on the different risk profiles of different age groups for osteosarcoma survival. This study aims to provide an overview of survival in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma in different age groups and prognostic variables for survival and local control among the entire cohort. In this single center retrospective cohort study, 402 patients with skeletal high-grade osteosarcoma were diagnosed and treated with curative intent between 1978 and 2017 at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). Prognostic factors for survival were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model. In this study poor overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were associated with increasing age. Age groups, tumor size, poor histopathological response, distant metastasis (DM) at presentation and local recurrence (LR) were important independent prognostic factors influencing OS and EFS. Differences in outcome among different age groups can be partially explained by patient and treatment characteristics.

Indexed as

age groupschemotherapylocal recurrencemetastasisosteosarcomaprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID33513855
PMCPMC7865349
OpenAlexW3121600472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.