Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513639›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2021

Does Big Mean Evil? Giant, but Benign Uterine Leiomyoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito, Natalia Lysei Ueno, Maira Rossmann Machado

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Giant "Hydra Headed" Uterine Fibroid in a Nullipara: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luiz Gustavo Oliveira BritoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7364-4718
Natalia Lysei UenoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-6407
Maira Rossmann MachadoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2984-494X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine leiomyoma is the most prevalent benign type of gynecological tumor. It affects more than 80% of women worldwide and, within this group, more than 50% may be asymptomatic. However, large fibroid volumes may be associated with symptoms of extrinsic compression, and most of the cases do not present atypical cells. We present the case of a 49-year-old woman who underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy of a 13.5-kg uterine leiomyoma with no malignancies at histopathology and review the literature about giant uterine leiomyomas and their clinical repercussion. We concluded that large volumes do not always pose a threat regarding malignancy; however, future molecular studies are needed to investigate giant uterine fibroids.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansHysterectomyLeiomyomaMiddle AgedUterine Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33513639
PMCPMC10183851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.