Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513233›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2021

Manual Therapy in Preadolescent Children: A Delphi Investigation of Physical Therapists in the United States.

Jenifer L Dice, Doug Dendy, Phillip S Sizer, Chad E Cook, Sara Feuling, Jean-Michel Brismée

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jenifer L DiceTexas Children's Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Houston, Texas, USA.
Doug DendyDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Phillip S SizerDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Chad E CookDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sara FeulingTexas Children's Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jean-Michel BrisméeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.
Texas Tech University · USDuke University · USTexas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLimited research has investigated the use of manual therapy to treat the preadolescent (0-12 years of age) population with musculoskeletal and neurological impairments. The purpose of this study was to identify the following among physical therapists holding advanced credentials in pediatrics, neurodevelopmental treatment, or manual therapy: (1) consensus regarding effective techniques in the preadolescent population, (2) differences in opinion, and (3) perceived decision-making barriers and factors regarding use of manual therapy techniques.

methodsCredentialed physical therapists in the United States were recruited for a 3-round Delphi investigation. An electronic survey in Round 1 identified musculoskeletal and neurological impairments and the manual techniques considered effective to treat such conditions, in addition to factors and barriers. Responses were used to create the second round, during which a 4-point Likert scale was used to score each survey item. A third round of scoring established consensus. Descriptive statistics and composite scores were calculated for each manual technique by impairment. Between-group differences were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction.

resultsConsensus was determined for several concepts. First, neuromuscular techniques were considered effective across all impairments, and joint mobilizations (grades I-IV) were believed to be effective to treat joint and muscle and myofascial impairments. Second, visceral manipulation and craniosacral therapy were considered ineffective in treating most impairments. There was lack of consensus and clear differences of opinion regarding the use of grade V mobilizations and dry needling. Significant barriers to use of manual therapy were: lack of knowledge, lack of evidence, and fear of litigation and harming patients.

conclusionThis study is an initial step for developing manual therapy guidelines, research, and educational opportunities regarding manual therapy in pediatric physical therapy.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdultChildChild, PreschoolDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesNervous System DiseasesUnited StatesChildrenDelphiDry NeedlingManipulationManual TherapyPediatricsPhysical Therapists

Identifiers

PMID33513233
OpenAlexW3123868242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.