Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513180›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

Kinetochore-independent mechanisms of sister chromosome separation.

Hannah Vicars, Travis Karg, Brandt Warecki, Ian Bast, William Sullivan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Disruption of the standard kinetochore in holocentricProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah VicarsDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3085-0669
Travis KargDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5621-3887
Brandt WareckiDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8025-6246
Ian BastDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-1910
William SullivanDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1756-4174
University of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Acentric Chromosome TransmissionR01GM120321 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI SULLIVAN, WILLIAM T. · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although kinetochores normally play a key role in sister chromatid separation and segregation, chromosome fragments lacking kinetochores (acentrics) can in some cases separate and segregate successfully. In Drosophila neuroblasts, acentric chromosomes undergo delayed, but otherwise normal sister separation, revealing the existence of kinetochore- independent mechanisms driving sister chromosome separation. Bulk cohesin removal from the acentric is not delayed, suggesting factors other than cohesin are responsible for the delay in acentric sister separation. In contrast to intact kinetochore-bearing chromosomes, we discovered that acentrics align parallel as well as perpendicular to the mitotic spindle. In addition, sister acentrics undergo unconventional patterns of separation. For example, rather than the simultaneous separation of sisters, acentrics oriented parallel to the spindle often slide past one another toward opposing poles. To identify the mechanisms driving acentric separation, we screened 117 RNAi gene knockdowns for synthetic lethality with acentric chromosome fragments. In addition to well-established DNA repair and checkpoint mutants, this candidate screen identified synthetic lethality with X-chromosome-derived acentric fragments in knockdowns of Greatwall (cell cycle kinase), EB1 (microtubule plus-end tracking protein), and Map205 (microtubule-stabilizing protein). Additional image-based screening revealed that reductions in Topoisomerase II levels disrupted sister acentric separation. Intriguingly, live imaging revealed that knockdowns of EB1, Map205, and Greatwall preferentially disrupted the sliding mode of sister acentric separation. Based on our analysis of EB1 localization and knockdown phenotypes, we propose that in the absence of a kinetochore, microtubule plus-end dynamics provide the force to resolve DNA catenations required for sister separation.

Indexed as

KinetochoresAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatidsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosome SegregationCohesinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIDrosophila melanogasterLarvaMetaphaseMicrotubulesMitosisSpindle ApparatusCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type II

Identifiers

PMID33513180
PMCPMC7886193
OpenAlexW3099242233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.