ArticlePloS one2021
Usefulness of the ratio of brachial pre-ejection period to brachial ejection time in prediction of cardiovascular and overall mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular systolic function is a good indicator of cardiac function and a powerful predictor of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. High ratio of pre-ejection period (PEP) to ejection time (ET) is associated with reduced left ventricular systolic function. Brachial PEP (bPEP) and brachial ET (bET) can be automatically calculated from an ankle-brachial index (ABI)-form device and bPEP/bET was recently reported to be a new and useful parameter of cardiac performance. However, there were no studies evaluating the utility of bPEP/bET for prediction of CV and overall mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We included 139 cases of AMI admitted to our cardiac care unit consecutively. ABI, bPEP, and bET were obtained from the ABI-form device within the 24 hours of admission. There were 87 overall and 22 CV mortality and the median follow-up to mortality event was 98 months. After multivariable analysis, high bPEP/bET was not only associated with increased long-term CV mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.046; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-1.088; P = 0.029), but also associated with long-term overall mortality (HR = 1.023; 95% CI: 1.001-1.045; P = 0.042). In addition, age was also a significant predictor for CV and overall mortality after the multivariable analysis. In conclusion, bPEP/bET was shown to be a significant predictor for CV and overall mortality in AMI patients after multivariable analysis. Therefore, by means of this novel parameter, we could easily find out the high-risk AMI patients with increased CV and overall mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.