Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513170›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Accurate prediction of clinical stroke scales and improved biomarkers of motor impairment from robotic measurements.

Dimitris K Agrafiotis, Eric Yang, Gary S Littman, Geert Byttebier, Laura Dipietro, Allitia DiBernardo, Juan C Chavez, Avrielle Rykman, Kate McArthur, Karim Hajjar and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Force/moment tracking performance during constant-pose, force-varying, bilaterally symmetric, hand-wrist tasks.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Dimitris K AgrafiotisJanssen Research & Development, Titusville, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5604-5692
Eric YangJanssen Research & Development, Titusville, New Jersey, United States of America.
Gary S LittmanGSL Statistical Consulting, Ardmore, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Geert ByttebierBioconstat Bvba, Gent, Belgium.
Laura DipietroDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Allitia DiBernardoJanssen Research & Development, Titusville, New Jersey, United States of America.
Juan C ChavezBiogen-Idec, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Avrielle RykmanBurke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, New York, United States of America.
Kate McArthurInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Karim HajjarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Kennedy R LeesInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Bruce T VolpeFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1098-1848
Michael KramsJanssen Research & Development, Titusville, New Jersey, United States of America.
Hermano I KrebsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Janssen (United States) · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USNovartis (United States) · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBBiogen (United States) · USBurke Medical Research Institute · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOne of the greatest challenges in clinical trial design is dealing with the subjectivity and variability introduced by human raters when measuring clinical end-points. We hypothesized that robotic measures that capture the kinematics of human movements collected longitudinally in patients after stroke would bear a significant relationship to the ordinal clinical scales and potentially lead to the development of more sensitive motor biomarkers that could improve the efficiency and cost of clinical trials. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used clinical scales and a robotic assay to measure arm movement in 208 patients 7, 14, 21, 30 and 90 days after acute ischemic stroke at two separate clinical sites. The robots are low impedance and low friction interactive devices that precisely measure speed, position and force, so that even a hemiparetic patient can generate a complete measurement profile. These profiles were used to develop predictive models of the clinical assessments employing a combination of artificial ant colonies and neural network ensembles.

resultsThe resulting models replicated commonly used clinical scales to a cross-validated R2 of 0.73, 0.75, 0.63 and 0.60 for the Fugl-Meyer, Motor Power, NIH stroke and modified Rankin scales, respectively. Moreover, when suitably scaled and combined, the robotic measures demonstrated a significant increase in effect size from day 7 to 90 over historical data (1.47 versus 0.67). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThese results suggest that it is possible to derive surrogate biomarkers that can significantly reduce the sample size required to power future stroke clinical trials.

Indexed as

MovementRecovery of FunctionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologic ExaminationRoboticsStrokeStroke Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID33513170
PMCPMC7845999
OpenAlexW3124295781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.