Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Epigenetic suppression of SLFN11 in germinal center B-cells during B-cell development.

Fumiya Moribe, Momoko Nishikori, Tsuyoshi Takashima, Daiki Taniyama, Nobuyuki Onishi, Hiroshi Arima, Hiroyuki Sasanuma, Remi Akagawa, Fathi Elloumi, Shunichi Takeda and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fumiya MoribeDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Momoko NishikoriDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4171-2162
Tsuyoshi TakashimaDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Daiki TaniyamaDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nobuyuki OnishiDivision of Gene Regulation, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi ArimaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroyuki SasanumaDepartment of Radiation Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Remi AkagawaDepartment of Radiation Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Fathi ElloumiDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Shunichi TakedaDepartment of Radiation Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7924-7991
Yves PommierDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch and Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Eiichi MoriiDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Akifumi Takaori-KondoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7678-4284
Junko MuraiInstitute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2023-6160
Kyoto University · JPKeio University · JPNational Cancer Institute · USThe University of Osaka · JPHiroshima University · JP

Funding

DNA Repair, Cell Cycle Checkpoints and Apoptosis as Targets for Anticancer DrugsZIABC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 2009 to 2025
$23.0M
Development Therapeutics Branch Clinical TrialsZIABC011746 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 2017 to 2025
$2.6M
PROTEIN-ASSOCIATED DNA BREAKS AS INDICATOR OF TOPOISOMERASE INHIBITIONZ01BC006150 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI POMMIER, YVES · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC006150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSLFN11 has recently been reported to execute cancer cells harboring replicative stress induced by DNA damaging agents. However, the roles of SLFN11 under physiological conditions remain poorly understood. Germinal center B-cells (GCBs) undergo somatic hypermutations and class-switch recombination, which can cause physiological genotoxic stress. Hence, we tested whether SLFN11 expression needs to be suppressed in GCBs during B-cell development.

objectiveTo clarify the expression profile of SLFN11 in different developmental stages of B-cells and B-cell-derived cancers.

methodsWe analyzed the expression of SLFN11 by mining cell line databases for different stages of normal B-cells and various types of B-cell-derived cancer cell lines. We performed dual immunohistochemical staining for SLFN11 and B-cell specific markers in normal human lymphatic tissues. We tested the effects of two epigenetic modifiers, an EZH2 inhibitor, tazemetostat (EPZ6438) and a histone deacetylase inhibitor, panobinostat (LBH589) on SLFN11 expression in GCB-derived lymphoma cell lines. We also examined the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs in combination with cytosine arabinoside and the effects of SLFN11 on the efficacy of cytosine arabinoside in SLFN11-overexpressing cells.

resultsSLFN11 mRNA level was found low in both normal GCBs and GCB-DLBCL (GCB like-diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). Immunohistochemical staining showed low SLFN11 expression in GCBs and high SLFN11 expression in plasmablasts and plasmacytes. The EZH2 and HDAC epigenetic modifiers upregulated SLFN11 expression in GCB-derived lymphoma cells and made them more susceptible to cytosine arabinoside. SLFN11 overexpression further sensitized GCB-derived lymphoma cells to cytosine arabinoside.

conclusionsThe expression of SLFN11 is epigenetically suppressed in normal GCBs and GCB-derived lymphomas. GCB-derived lymphomas with low SLFN11 expression can be treated by the combination of epigenetic modifiers and cytosine arabinoside.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorDatabases, GeneticEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsGene ExpressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGerminal CenterHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansLymphocyte ActivationLymphocytesLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseNuclear ProteinsPlasma CellsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsNuclear ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6SLFN11 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33513156
PMCPMC7846023
OpenAlexW3121190469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.