Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513145›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Overview of snakebite in Brazil: Possible drivers and a tool for risk mapping.

Maria Cristina Schneider, Kyung-Duk Min, Patricia Nájera Hamrick, Lucia R Montebello, Tani Maria Ranieri, Lucia Mardini, Volney M Camara, Ronir Raggio Luiz, Bernhard Liese, Myriam Vuckovic and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of variables associated with snakebite risk in spatial and temporal analyses.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. What are the characteristics and where is the highest risk of snakebite accidents in the state of São Paulo?Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Identification of Risk Areas forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria Cristina SchneiderDepartment of International Health, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8575-8002
Kyung-Duk MinInstitute of Health and Environment, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1000-2187
Patricia Nájera HamrickDepartment of Health Emergencies, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7854-4778
Lucia R MontebelloDepartment of Immunization and Transmissible Diseases, Health Surveillance Secretary, Ministry of Health of Brazil, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-7101
Tani Maria RanieriEpidemiological Surveillance Division, State Health Department of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Lucia MardiniEpidemiological Surveillance Division, State Health Department of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Volney M CamaraInstitute of Collective Health Studies, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6596-6653
Ronir Raggio LuizInstitute of Collective Health Studies, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Bernhard LieseDepartment of International Health, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-7541
Myriam VuckovicDepartment of International Health, School of Nursing and Health Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Milton Ozorio MoraesOswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Ministry of Health of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Nísia Trindade LimaOswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Ministry of Health of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2494-7077

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming affects close to 2.7 million people globally every year. In Brazil, snakebites are reported to the Ministry of Health surveillance system and cases receive antivenom free of charge. There is an urgent need to identify higher risk areas for antivenom distribution, and to develop prevention activities. The objective of this study is to provide an overview of the epidemiological situation of snakebite envenoming in Brazil and explore possible drivers; as well as to create a flowchart tool to support decision-makers identify higher risk areas. An ecological-type study was carried out using data by municipality (2013-2017). Study parts: 1) Create a geocoded database and perform a descriptive and cluster analysis; 2) Statistical analysis to measure the association of snakebite and possible environmental and socioeconomic drivers; 3) Develop a flowchart to support decision-makers and the application of this tool in one state (Rio Grande do Sul) as an example. An average of 27,120 snakebite cases per year were reported at the country level. Clusters of municipalities with high numbers of snakebites are mostly found in the Amazon Legal Region. The negative binomial regression model showed association with the snakebite case count: the type of major habitat, tropical or non-tropical; temperature; percentage of urbanization; precipitation; elevation; GDP per capita; a weaker relation with forest loss; and with venomous snake richness. The state where the instrument was applied reported 4,227 snakebites in the period. Most municipalities were considered as medium risk and 56/496 as high risk according to the tool created. Snakebite cases are distributed across the entire country with the highest concentration in the Legal Amazon Region. This creates a complex situation both for better understanding of the association of environmental and socioeconomic factors with snakebites and for the distribution and maintenance of antivenom to remote areas. Research into types of antivenom with a longer shelf life without the need for refrigeration is needed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiveninsBrazilDecision MakingGeographic MappingHumansIncidenceRisk AssessmentSnake BitesSnakesSocioeconomic FactorsAntivenins

Identifiers

PMID33513145
PMCPMC7875335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.