Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513131›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Modeling invasion patterns in the glioblastoma battlefield.

Martina Conte, Sergio Casas-Tintò, Juan Soler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Go-or-grow models in biology: a monster on a leash.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Drosophila melanogaster as a Model System for Human Glioblastoma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Modelling microtube driven invasion of glioma.Journal of mathematical biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martina ConteBCAM - Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8477-3267
Sergio Casas-TintòDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neurobiology, Instituto Cajal CSIC, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9589-9981
Juan SolerDepartamento de Matemática Aplicada and Research Unit "Modeling Nature" (MNat), Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8683-5994
Basque Center for Applied Mathematics · ESInstituto Cajal · ESUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive tumor of the central nervous system, due to its great infiltration capacity. Understanding the mechanisms that regulate the Glioblastoma invasion front is a major challenge with preeminent potential clinical relevances. In the infiltration front, the key features of tumor dynamics relate to biochemical and biomechanical aspects, which result in the extension of cellular protrusions known as tumor microtubes. The coordination of metalloproteases expression, extracellular matrix degradation, and integrin activity emerges as a leading mechanism that facilitates Glioblastoma expansion and infiltration in uncontaminated brain regions. We propose a novel multidisciplinary approach, based on in vivo experiments in Drosophila and mathematical models, that describes the dynamics of active and inactive integrins in relation to matrix metalloprotease concentration and tumor density at the Glioblastoma invasion front. The mathematical model is based on a non-linear system of evolution equations in which the mechanisms leading chemotaxis, haptotaxis, and front dynamics compete with the movement induced by the saturated flux in porous media. This approach is able to capture the relative influences of the involved agents and reproduce the formation of patterns, which drive tumor front evolution. These patterns have the value of providing biomarker information that is related to the direction of the dynamical evolution of the front and based on static measures of proteins in several tumor samples. Furthermore, we consider in our model biomechanical elements, like the tissue porosity, as indicators of the healthy tissue resistance to tumor progression.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell MovementComputational BiologyDrosophilaHumansIntegrinsNeoplasm InvasivenessNeurogliaPeptide HydrolasesTumor MicroenvironmentIntegrinsPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID33513131
PMCPMC7875342
OpenAlexW3125102179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.