ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
HippoUnit: A software tool for the automated testing and systematic comparison of detailed models of hippocampal neurons based on electrophysiological data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- How to train your neuron: developing a detailed, up-to-date, multipurpose model of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Transient boosting of action potential backpropagation for few-shot temporal pattern learning.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- WhenAPL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Multi-scale modelling of location- and frequency-dependent synaptic plasticity induced by repetitive magnetic stimulation in the dendrites of pyramidal neurons.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Evaluation and comparison of methods for neuronal parameter optimization using the Neuroptimus software framework.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Community-based reconstruction and simulation of a full-scale model of the rat hippocampus CA1 region.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Synaptic and dendritic architecture of different types of hippocampal somatostatin interneurons.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Hippocampome.org v2.0: a knowledge base enabling data-driven spiking neural network simulations of rodent hippocampal circuits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Online interoperable resources for building hippocampal neuron models via the Hippocampus Hub.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- Quantitative analysis of the optogenetic excitability of CA1 neurons.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Scaling and Benchmarking an Evolutionary Algorithm for Constructing Biophysical Neuronal Models.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- The EBRAINS Hodgkin-Huxley Neuron Builder: An online resource for building data-driven neuron models.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- DNA Methylation Biomarkers-Based Human Age Prediction Using Machine Learning.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- A new reduced-morphology model for CA1 pyramidal cells and its validation and comparison with other models using HippoUnit.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anatomically and biophysically detailed data-driven neuronal models have become widely used tools for understanding and predicting the behavior and function of neurons. Due to the increasing availability of experimental data from anatomical and electrophysiological measurements as well as the growing number of computational and software tools that enable accurate neuronal modeling, there are now a large number of different models of many cell types available in the literature. These models were usually built to capture a few important or interesting properties of the given neuron type, and it is often unknown how they would behave outside their original context. In addition, there is currently no simple way of quantitatively comparing different models regarding how closely they match specific experimental observations. This limits the evaluation, re-use and further development of the existing models. Further, the development of new models could also be significantly facilitated by the ability to rapidly test the behavior of model candidates against the relevant collection of experimental data. We address these problems for the representative case of the CA1 pyramidal cell of the rat hippocampus by developing an open-source Python test suite, which makes it possible to automatically and systematically test multiple properties of models by making quantitative comparisons between the models and electrophysiological data. The tests cover various aspects of somatic behavior, and signal propagation and integration in apical dendrites. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we applied our tests to compare the behavior of several different rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell models from the ModelDB database against electrophysiological data available in the literature, and evaluated how well these models match experimental observations in different domains. We also show how we employed the test suite to aid the development of models within the European Human Brain Project (HBP), and describe the integration of the tests into the validation framework developed in the HBP, with the aim of facilitating more reproducible and transparent model building in the neuroscience community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.