Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33513130›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

HippoUnit: A software tool for the automated testing and systematic comparison of detailed models of hippocampal neurons based on electrophysiological data.

Sára Sáray, Christian A Rössert, Shailesh Appukuttan, Rosanna Migliore, Paola Vitale, Carmen A Lupascu, Luca L Bologna, Werner Van Geit, Armando Romani, Andrew P Davison and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. WhenAPL bioengineering · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quantitative analysis of the optogenetic excitability of CA1 neurons.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sára SárayFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-177X
Christian A RössertBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4839-2424
Shailesh AppukuttanParis-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0148-8023
Rosanna MiglioreInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9034-7849
Paola VitaleInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8725-7201
Carmen A LupascuInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.
Luca L BolognaInstitute of Biophysics, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7280-9285
Werner Van GeitBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2915-720X
Armando RomaniBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6388-4286
Andrew P DavisonParis-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique/Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4793-7541
Eilif MullerBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4309-8266
Tamás F FreundFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary.
Szabolcs KáliFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2740-6057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomically and biophysically detailed data-driven neuronal models have become widely used tools for understanding and predicting the behavior and function of neurons. Due to the increasing availability of experimental data from anatomical and electrophysiological measurements as well as the growing number of computational and software tools that enable accurate neuronal modeling, there are now a large number of different models of many cell types available in the literature. These models were usually built to capture a few important or interesting properties of the given neuron type, and it is often unknown how they would behave outside their original context. In addition, there is currently no simple way of quantitatively comparing different models regarding how closely they match specific experimental observations. This limits the evaluation, re-use and further development of the existing models. Further, the development of new models could also be significantly facilitated by the ability to rapidly test the behavior of model candidates against the relevant collection of experimental data. We address these problems for the representative case of the CA1 pyramidal cell of the rat hippocampus by developing an open-source Python test suite, which makes it possible to automatically and systematically test multiple properties of models by making quantitative comparisons between the models and electrophysiological data. The tests cover various aspects of somatic behavior, and signal propagation and integration in apical dendrites. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we applied our tests to compare the behavior of several different rat hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell models from the ModelDB database against electrophysiological data available in the literature, and evaluated how well these models match experimental observations in different domains. We also show how we employed the test suite to aid the development of models within the European Human Brain Project (HBP), and describe the integration of the tests into the validation framework developed in the HBP, with the aim of facilitating more reproducible and transparent model building in the neuroscience community.

Indexed as

CA1 Region, HippocampalModels, NeurologicalSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyDendritesElectrophysiological PhenomenaElectrophysiologyPyramidal CellsRats

Identifiers

PMID33513130
PMCPMC7875359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.