Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33512814›Full record

Trial reportTurkish journal of medical sciences2021

Comparison of local infiltration analgesia and interscalene block for postoperative pain management in shoulder arthroscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Olgun Bingöl, Alper Deveci, Semih Başkan, Güzelali Özdemir, Enver Kılıç, Emrah Arslantaş

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Effectiveness of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction using a "sandwich" patch combined with platelet-rich plasma injection in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olgun BingölDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-1720-1709
Alper DeveciDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Private Ortadogu Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-6216-3030
Semih BaşkanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0096-7097
Güzelali ÖzdemirDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-4279-0955
Enver KılıçDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-00015475-8966
Emrah ArslantaşDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sinop Boyabat 75. Yıl Hospital, Sinop, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-5166-7708
Memorial Ankara Hospital · TRSinop University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of local infiltration analgesia and interscalene brachial plexus block techniques on postoperative pain control and shoulder functional scores in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Materials and methods: Sixty patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was comprised of patients who had interscalene brachial plexus block, while group 2 was comprised of patients who had local infiltration analgesia. In group 1, interscalene block was applied with 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine. In group 2, the Ranawat cocktail was used for local infiltration analgesia. Sixty milliliters of Ranawat cocktail was applied to the subacromial space and glenohumeral joint in equal amounts. Postoperative pain was assessed by the VAS score. Functional scores of the shoulder were also evaluated by Constant–Murley and UCLA scores. The time of first analgesic requirement and total analgesic consumption in the postoperative period were assessed. Results: The first analgesic requirement was significantly late in the interscalene brachial plexus block group (p = 0.000). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of total analgesic consumption (p = 0.204). In the postoperative 6th h, the VAS score was 2.43 in the interscalene brachial plexus block group, whereas 2.86 in the local infiltration analgesia group (p = 0.323). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of Constant–Murley shoulder and UCLA scores in the 3rd postoperative month (respectively, p = 0.929, p = 0.671). Besides, postoperative VAS scores and functional scores were negatively correlated (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Local infiltration analgesia is an effective alternative to interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain management and total analgesic consumption in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, the interscalene brachial plexus block provides a longer postoperative painless period.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaBrachial Plexus BlockAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalArthroscopyHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesShoulderAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalFunctional scoresinterscalene blocklocal infiltration analgesiapostoperative pain managementrotator cuff repairshoulder arthroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33512814
PMCPMC8283434
OpenAlexW3121717184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.