Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33512557›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2021

Neurotoxicity and underlying cellular changes of 21 mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibitors.

Johannes Delp, Andrea Cediel-Ulloa, Ilinca Suciu, Petra Kranaster, Barbara Ma van Vugt-Lussenburg, Vesna Munic Kos, Wanda van der Stel, Giada Carta, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Paul Jennings and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Johannes DelpIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation, University of Konstanz, Universitaetsstr. 10, 78464, Konstanz, Germany.
Andrea Cediel-UlloaSwetox, Unit for Toxicological Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ilinca SuciuIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation, University of Konstanz, Universitaetsstr. 10, 78464, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-9982
Petra KranasterIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation, University of Konstanz, Universitaetsstr. 10, 78464, Konstanz, Germany.
Barbara Ma van Vugt-LussenburgBioDetection Systems BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vesna Munic KosSwetox, Unit for Toxicological Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Wanda van der StelDivision of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Giada CartaDivision of Molecular and Computational Toxicology, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Susanne Hougaard BennekouNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Lyngby, Denmark.
Paul JenningsDivision of Molecular and Computational Toxicology, Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Bob van de WaterDivision of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anna ForsbySwetox, Unit for Toxicological Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcel LeistIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Department inaugurated by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation, University of Konstanz, Universitaetsstr. 10, 78464, Konstanz, Germany. marcel.leist@uni-konstanz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition of complex I of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (cI) by rotenone and methyl-phenylpyridinium (MPP +) leads to the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in man and rodents. To formally describe this mechanism of toxicity, an adverse outcome pathway (AOP:3) has been developed that implies that any inhibitor of cI, or possibly of other parts of the respiratory chain, would have the potential to trigger parkinsonian motor deficits. We used here 21 pesticides, all of which are described in the literature as mitochondrial inhibitors, to study the general applicability of AOP:3 or of in vitro assays that are assessing its activation. Five cI, three complex II (cII), and five complex III (cIII) inhibitors were characterized in detail in human dopaminergic neuronal cell cultures. The NeuriTox assay, examining neurite damage in LUHMES cells, was used as in vitro proxy of the adverse outcome (AO), i.e., of dopaminergic neurodegeneration. This test provided data on whether test compounds were unspecific cytotoxicants or specifically neurotoxic, and it yielded potency data with respect to neurite degeneration. The pesticide panel was also examined in assays for the sequential key events (KE) leading to the AO, i.e., mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibition, mitochondrial dysfunction, and disturbed proteostasis. Data from KE assays were compared to the NeuriTox data (AO). The cII-inhibitory pesticides tested here did not appear to trigger the AOP:3 at all. Some of the cI/cIII inhibitors showed a consistent AOP activation response in all assays, while others did not. In general, there was a clear hierarchy of assay sensitivity: changes of gene expression (biomarker of neuronal stress) correlated well with NeuriTox data; mitochondrial failure (measured both by a mitochondrial membrane potential-sensitive dye and a respirometric assay) was about 10-260 times more sensitive than neurite damage (AO); cI/cIII activity was sometimes affected at > 1000 times lower concentrations than the neurites. These data suggest that the use of AOP:3 for hazard assessment has a number of caveats: (i) specific parkinsonian neurodegeneration cannot be easily predicted from assays of mitochondrial dysfunction; (ii) deriving a point-of-departure for risk assessment from early KE assays may overestimate toxicant potency.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCell LineCell Line, TumorDopaminergic NeuronsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectron TransportElectron Transport Chain Complex ProteinsElectron Transport Complex IElectron Transport Complex IIElectron Transport Complex IIIEnzyme InhibitorsHumansMitochondriaPesticidesProteostasisRisk AssessmentBiomarkersElectron Transport Chain Complex ProteinsElectron Transport Complex IElectron Transport Complex IIElectron Transport Complex IIIEnzyme InhibitorsPesticidesAOP:3High-content imagingIn vitro neurotoxicityMechanistic safety assessmentMitotoxicityTempO-Seq

Identifiers

PMID33512557
PMCPMC7870626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.