ArticleJournal of radiation research2021
Dosimetry of inhaled 219Rn progeny.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mathematical complexities in radionuclide metabolic modelling: a review of ordinary differential equation kinetics solvers in biokinetic modelling.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2024Review
- Mathematical solutions in internal dose assessment: A comparison of Python-based differential equation solvers in biokinetic modeling.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During prostate cancer treatment with 223Ra. 219Rn (actinon) occurs and may be exhaled by the patient. Nurses and other hospital employees may inhale this radionuclide and its decay products. The alpha-emitting decay products of actinon deposited within a body will irradiate tissues and organs. Therefore. it is necessary to evaluate organ doses of actinon progeny. The purpose of this study is to set up a dosimetric method to assess dose coefficients for actinon progeny. The effective dose coefficients were calculated separately for three modes. The unattached mode which concerned the activity median thermodynamic diameter (AMTD) of 1 nm. and the nucleation and accumulation modes which are represented by activity median aerodynamic diameters (AMAD) of 60 and 500 nm respectively. The recent biokinetic models of actinon progeny developed in the Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides (OIR) publications series of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) were implemented on BIOKMOD (Biokinetic Modeling) to calculate the number of nuclear transformations per activity intake of actinon progeny. The organ equivalent and effective dose coefficients were determined using the dosimetric approach of the ICRP. The inhalation dose coefficients of actinon progeny are dominated by the contribution of lung dose. The calculated dose coefficients of 211Pb and 211Bi are 5.78 × 10-8 and 4.84 × 10-9 Sv.Bq-1 for unattached particles (AMTD = 1 nm). and 1.4 × 10-8 and 3.55 × 10-9 Sv.Bq-1 for attached particles (AMAD = 60 nm). and 7.37 × 10-9 and 1.91 × 10-9 Sv.Bq-1 for attached particles (AMAD = 500 nm). These values are much closer to those of the recently published ICRP 137.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.