ArticleJMIR diabetes2021
Ability of Current Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict and Detect Hypoglycemia in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analysis.
Article in JMIR diabetes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiences and Perceived Influence of the Artificial Intelligence-Based Health Education Accurately Linking System (AI-HEALS) on Health Behaviors Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of ChatGPT in personalized glucose-lowering strategy development: a clinician-based comparative study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Managing Exercise-Related Glycemic Events in Type 1 Diabetes: Development and Validation of Predictive Models for a Practical Decision Support Tool.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Transparency and Validity of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Self-Care in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes-An Integrative Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Harnessing gut-derived bioactives and AI diagnostics for the next generation of type 2 diabetes solutions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Predicting Dysglycemia in Patients with Diabetes Using Electrocardiogram.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Machine Learning Model for Risk Stratification of Postdiagnosis Diabetic Ketoacidosis Hospitalization in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Retrospective Study.JMIR diabetes · 2024Article
- Article
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Nocturnal High- and Low-Glucose Prediction in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Explainable Machine Learning for Real-Time Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Prediction and Personalized Control Recommendations.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Models for Blood Glucose Level Prediction in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Review
- Machine Learning Approach to Drug Treatment Strategy for Diabetes Care.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2023Review
- Systemic inflammation as a biomarker of seizure propensity and a target for treatment to reduce seizure propensity.Epilepsia open · 2023Review
- Continuous glucose monitoring for children with hypoglycaemia: Evidence in 2023.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Automatic inference of hypoglycemia causes in type 1 diabetes: a feasibility study.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2023Article
- Utilization of Personalized Machine-Learning to Screen for Dysglycemia from Ambulatory ECG, toward Noninvasive Blood Glucose Monitoring.Biosensors · 2022Article
- A computational framework for discovering digital biomarkers of glycemic control.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Machine Learning Models for Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Prediction in Hospitalized Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) algorithms have been widely introduced to diabetes research including those for the identification of hypoglycemia.
objectiveThe objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the current ability of ML algorithms to detect hypoglycemia (ie, alert to hypoglycemia coinciding with its symptoms) or predict hypoglycemia (ie, alert to hypoglycemia before its symptoms have occurred).
methodsElectronic literature searches (from January 1, 1950, to September 14, 2020) were conducted using the Dialog platform that covers 96 databases of peer-reviewed literature. Included studies had to train the ML algorithm in order to build a model to detect or predict hypoglycemia and test its performance. The set of 2 × 2 data (ie, number of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives) was pooled with a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model.
resultsA total of 33 studies (14 studies for detecting hypoglycemia and 19 studies for predicting hypoglycemia) were eligible. For detection of hypoglycemia, pooled estimates (95% CI) of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 0.79 (0.75-0.83), 0.80 (0.64-0.91), 8.05 (4.79-13.51), and 0.18 (0.12-0.27), respectively. For prediction of hypoglycemia, pooled estimates (95% CI) were 0.80 (0.72-0.86) for sensitivity, 0.92 (0.87-0.96) for specificity, 10.42 (5.82-18.65) for PLR, and 0.22 (0.15-0.31) for NLR.
conclusionsCurrent ML algorithms have insufficient ability to detect ongoing hypoglycemia and considerate ability to predict impeding hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes mellitus using hypoglycemic drugs with regard to diagnostic tests in accordance with the Users' Guide to Medical Literature (PLR should be ≥5 and NLR should be ≤0.2 for moderate reliability). However, it should be emphasized that the clinical applicability of these ML algorithms should be evaluated according to patients' risk profiles such as for hypoglycemia and its associated complications (eg, arrhythmia, neuroglycopenia) as well as the average ability of the ML algorithms. Continued research is required to develop more accurate ML algorithms than those that currently exist and to enhance the feasibility of applying ML in clinical settings.
trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020163682; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020163682.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.