ArticleBiomacromolecules2021
Judging Enzyme-Responsive Micelles by Their Covers: Direct Comparison of Dendritic Amphiphiles with Different Hydrophilic Blocks.
Article in Biomacromolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Micellar Chrysin-Quercetin-Rutin Formulation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Coated with Glucosylated poly(2-oxazoline)s: A Supramolecular Toolbox Approach.Biomacromolecules · 2025Article
- Cascade Mesophase Transitions of Multi-enzyme Responsive Polymeric Formulations.Biomacromolecules · 2024Article
- Hydrogel Microneedles with Programmed Mesophase Transitions for Controlled Drug Delivery.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- Solid-Phase Synthesis as a Tool to Create Exactly Defined, Branched Polymer Vectors for Cell Membrane Targeting.Macromolecules · 2024Article
- Reaching the Tumor: Mobility of Polymeric Micelles Inside anACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Biological ActivityBiomacromolecules · 2023Article
- Architecture-Based Programming of Polymeric Micelles to Undergo Sequential Mesophase Transitions.ACS macro letters · 2023Article
- Exploring the Application of Micellar Drug Delivery Systems in Cancer Nanomedicine.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Amplifying the efficacy of ALA-based prodrugs for photodynamic therapy using nanotechnology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Novel ABA block copolymers: preparation, temperature sensitivity, and drug release.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Stimuli-Induced Architectural Transition as a Tool for Controlling the Enzymatic Degradability of Polymeric Micelles.ACS polymers Au · 2022Article
- Stimuli-Responsive Nanoparticles for Controlled Drug Delivery in Synergistic Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enzymatically degradable polymeric micelles have great potential as drug delivery systems, allowing the selective release of their active cargo at the site of disease. Furthermore, enzymatic degradation of the polymeric nanocarriers facilitates clearance of the delivery system after it has completed its task. While extensive research is dedicated toward the design and study of the enzymatically degradable hydrophobic block, there is limited understanding on how the hydrophilic shell of the micelle can affect the properties of such enzymatically degradable micelles. In this work, we report a systematic head-to-head comparison of well-defined polymeric micelles with different polymeric shells and two types of enzymatically degradable hydrophobic cores. To carry out this direct comparison, we developed a highly modular approach for preparing clickable, spectrally active enzyme-responsive dendrons with adjustable degree of hydrophobicity. The dendrons were linked with three different widely used hydrophilic polymers-poly(ethylene glycol), poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline), and poly(acrylic acid) using the CuAAC click reaction. The high modularity and molecular precision of the synthetic methodology enabled us to easily prepare well-defined amphiphiles that differ either in their hydrophilic block composition or in their hydrophobic dendron. The micelles of the different amphiphiles were thoroughly characterized and their sizes, critical micelle concentrations, drug loading, stability, and cell internalization were compared. We found that the micelle diameter was almost solely dependent on the hydrophobicity of the dendritic hydrophobic block, whereas the enzymatic degradation rate was strongly dependent on the composition of both blocks. Drug encapsulation capacity was very sensitive to the type of the hydrophilic block, indicating that, in addition to the hydrophobic core, the micellar shell also has a significant role in drug encapsulation. Incubation of the spectrally active micelles in the presence of cells showed that the hydrophilic shell significantly affects the micellar stability, localization, cell internalization kinetics, and the cargo release mechanism. Overall, the high molecular precision and the ability of these amphiphiles to report their disassembly, even in complex biological media, allowed us to directly compare the different types of micelles, providing striking insights into how the composition of the micelle shells and cores can affect their properties and potential to serve as nanocarriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.