Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33511565›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

Barriers to Accessing Nighttime Supervisors: a National Survey of Internal Medicine Residents.

Jillian S Catalanotti, Alec B O'Connor, Michael Kisielewski, Davoren A Chick, Kathlyn E Fletcher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acute Medical Care by Nocturnists: A Narrative Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jillian S CatalanottiDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, The George Washington University, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW - Suite 5-416, Washington, DC, 20037, USA. Jcatalanotti@mfa.gwu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3603-1493
Alec B O'ConnorDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Michael KisielewskiAlliance for Academic Internal Medicine, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Davoren A ChickDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kathlyn E FletcherDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin/Milwaukee VAMC, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
American College of Physicians · USGeorge Washington University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USSociety of General Internal Medicine · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-center studies have reported residents experience barriers to accessing supervising physicians overnight, but no national dataset has described barriers perceived by residents or the association between supervision models and perceived barriers.

objectiveTo explore residents' perception of barriers to accessing overnight supervision.

designQuestions about overnight supervision and barriers to accessing it were included on the American College of Physicians Internal Medicine In-Training Examination® (IM-ITE®) Resident Survey in Fall 2017.

participantsAll US-based internal medicine residents who completed the 2017 IM-ITE®. Responses from 20,744 residents (84%) were analyzed. MAIN MEASURES: For our main outcome, we calculated percentages of responses for eight barriers and tested for association with the presence or absence of nocturnists. For our secondary outcome, we categorized free-text responses enumerating barriers from all residents into the five Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) categories to elucidate future areas for study or intervention. KEY

resultsInternal medicine residents working in hospitals without nocturnists more commonly reported having at least one barrier to accessing a supervising physician "always" or "most of the time" (5075/9842, 51.6%) compared to residents in hospitals with nocturnists (3074/10,902, 28.2%, p < 0.001). Among residents in hospitals without nocturnists, the most frequently reported barrier to accessing attending supervision was attendings not being present in the hospital (30.4% "always" or "most of the time"); residents in hospitals with nocturnists most frequently reported desire to make their own decisions as a barrier to contacting attendings (15.7% "always" or "most of the time"). Free-text responses from residents with and without nocturnists most commonly revealed organization (47%) barriers to accessing supervision; 28% cited person barriers, and 23% cited tools/technology barriers.

conclusionsPresence of nocturnists is associated with fewer reported barriers to contacting supervising physicians overnight. Organizational culture, work schedules, desire for independence, interpersonal interactions, and technology may present important barriers.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPhysiciansClinical CompetenceHumansInternal MedicinePersonnel Staffing and SchedulingSurveys and Questionnairesgraduate medical educationhospitalistnocturnistsupervision

Identifiers

PMID33511565
PMCPMC8298702
OpenAlexW3123397961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.