Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33511493›Full record

Observational studyActa diabetologica2021

Glycaemic control in the paediatric and young adult population with type 1 diabetes following a single telehealth visit - what have we learned from the COVID-19 lockdown?

Marianna Rachmiel, Yael Lebenthal, Kineret Mazor-Aronovitch, Avivit Brener, Noa Levek, Neria Levran, Efrat Chorna, Michal Dekel, Galia Barash, Zohar Landau and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta diabetologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Telemedicine for the Clinical Management of Diabetes; Implications and Considerations After COVID-19 Experience.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marianna RachmielPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Tzrifin, Israel. mariannar@shamir.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-0831
Yael LebenthalSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5963-0574
Kineret Mazor-AronovitchSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Avivit BrenerSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-8264
Noa LevekNational Juvenile Diabetes Center, Maccabi Health Care Services, Ra'anana, Israel.
Neria LevranNational Juvenile Diabetes Center, Maccabi Health Care Services, Ra'anana, Israel.
Efrat ChornaPediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Unit, Dana-Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Michal DekelPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Tzrifin, Israel.
Galia BarashPediatric Endocrinology Unit, Shamir (Assaf Harofeh) Medical Center, Tzrifin, Israel.
Zohar LandauNational Juvenile Diabetes Center, Maccabi Health Care Services, Ra'anana, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0434-9563
Orit Pinhas-HamielSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-8091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsChildren with chronic diseases were unable to receive their usual care during COVID-19 lockdown. We assessed the feasibility and impact of telehealth visits on the time-in-range (TIR) of paediatric individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

methodsAn observational multicentre real-life study. Patients scheduled for an in-clinic visit during the lockdown were offered to participate in a telehealth visit. Sociodemographic, clinical, continuous glucose monitor and pump data were recorded 2 weeks prior and 2 weeks after telehealth visit. The primary endpoint was change in relative-TIR, i.e. change in TIR divided by the percent of possible change (∆TIR/(100-TIRbefore)*100).

resultsThe study group comprised 195 individuals with T1D (47.7% males), mean±SD age 14.6 ± 5.3 years, and diabetes duration 6.0 ± 4.6 years. Telehealth was accomplished with 121 patients and their parents (62.0%); 74 (38.0%) did not transfer complete data. Mean TIR was significantly higher for the two-week period after the telehealth visit than for the two-week period prior the visit (62.9 ± 16.0, p < 0.001 vs. 59.0 ± 17.2); the improvement in relative-TIR was 5.7±26.1%. Initial higher mean glucose level, lower TIR, less time spent at <54 mg/dl range, longer time spent at 180-250 mg/dl range, higher daily insulin dose, and single-parent household were associated with improved relative-TIR. Multiple regression logistic analysis demonstrated only initial lower TIR and single-parent household were significant, odds ratio: -0.506, (95%CI -0.99,-0.023), p=0.04 and 13.82, (95%CI 0.621, 27.016), p=0.04, respectively.

conclusionsPaediatric and young adult patients with T1D benefited from a telehealth visit during COVID-19. However, this modality is not yet suitable for a considerable proportion of patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGlycemic ControlHumansIsraelMaleTelemedicineYoung AdultBlood GlucoseAdolescentsCGM metricsChildrenTelehealthTelemedicineTime-in-range

Identifiers

PMID33511493
PMCPMC7842171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.