Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33511455›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2021

Patient Reported Outcomes in Large Vessel Vasculitides.

Joanna Robson, Sarah Mackie, Catherine Hill

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Looking ahead: giant-cell arteritis in 10 years time.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joanna RobsonCentre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK. Jo.Robson@uwe.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7939-5978
Sarah MackieVascular Rheumatology, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2483-5873
Catherine HillRheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-4922
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · AUUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-CS-012-016Department of Health PB-PG-1217-20017Medical Research Council MR/N011775/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe goal of this paper is to review current and future uses of patient-reported outcomes in large vessel vasculitis. The large vessel vasculitides comprise Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu arteritis; both are types of systemic vasculitis which affect the larger blood vessels. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture the impact of these diseases on health-related quality of life. RECENT

findingsGeneric PROs such as the SF-36 are currently used to compare HRQOL of people with GCA and TAK within clinical trials and observational studies and to make comparisons with the general population and HRQoL in other diseases. The development of a disease-specific PRO for GCA is currently underway. Beyond clinical trials, there is much interest in the use of PROs within routine clinical care, particularly E-PROs for remote use. Further work will be needed to complete the development of disease-specific PROs for people with large vessel vasculitis and to establish feasibility, acceptability, and utility of E-PROs.

Indexed as

Giant Cell ArteritisPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSystemic VasculitisTakayasu ArteritisHumansQuality of LifeClinical trialsGiant cell arteritisLarge vessel vasculitisOutcomesPatient reported outcomeTakayasu arteritis

Identifiers

PMID33511455
PMCPMC7843539
OpenAlexW3121764050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.