Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33511452›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021

Assessment of Illumina® Human mtDNA Genome assay: workflow evaluation with development of analysis and interpretation guidelines.

Viktorija Sukser, Filip Rokić, Lucija Barbarić, Marina Korolija

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Viktorija SukserBiology and Fibres Department, Forensic Science Centre "Ivan Vučetić", Ilica 335, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Filip RokićLaboratory for Advanced Genomics, Division of Molecular Medicine, "Ruđer Bošković" Institute, Bijenička cesta 54, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Lucija BarbarićBiology and Fibres Department, Forensic Science Centre "Ivan Vučetić", Ilica 335, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marina KorolijaBiology and Fibres Department, Forensic Science Centre "Ivan Vučetić", Ilica 335, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. mkorolija@mup.hr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4892-0204
Psychiatric Hospital Sveti Ivan · HRRuđer Bošković Institute · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a small but significant part of the human genome, whose applicability potential has gradually increased with the advent of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technology. Knowledge of the particular workflow, equipment, and reagents used, along with extensive usage of negative controls to monitor all preparation steps constitute the prerequisites for confident reporting of results. In this study, we performed an assessment of Illumina® Human mtDNA Genome assay on MiSeq FGx™ instrument. Through analysis of several types of negative controls, as well as mtDNA positive controls, we established thresholds for data analysis and interpretation, consisting of several components: minimum read depth (220 reads), minimum quality score (41), percentage of minor allele sufficient for analysis (3.0%), percentage of minor allele sufficient for interpretation (6.0%), and percentage of major allele sufficient for homoplasmic variant call (97.0%). Based on these criteria, we defined internal guidelines for analysis and interpretation of mtDNA results obtained by MPS. Our study shows that the whole mtDNA assay on MiSeq FGx™ produces repeatable and reproducible results, independent of the analyst, which are also concordant with Sanger-type sequencing results for mtDNA control region, as well as with MPS results produced by NextSeq®. Overall, established thresholds and interpretation guidelines were successfully applied for the sequencing of complete mitochondrial genomes from high-quality samples. The underlying principles and proposed methodology on the definition of internal laboratory guidelines for analysis and interpretation of MPS results may be applicable to similar MPS workflows, e.g. targeting good-quality samples in forensic genetics and molecular diagnostics.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialDNA, MitochondrialGuidelines as TopicHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowDNA, MitochondrialAnalysis thresholdsEvaluationMiSeqMitochondrial DNANextera XT

Identifiers

PMID33511452
OpenAlexW3125891393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.