ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021
Primers for specific detection and identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola and P. cannabina pv. alisalensis.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Steroids Obtained fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Complete and Draft Genome Sequences of the Cruciferous Pathogens Pseudomonas cannabina pv. alisalensis and Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola.Microbiology resource announcements · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial leaf spot and bacterial leaf blight are global threats to the cultivation of cruciferous vegetables, and it is necessary to develop methods to easily detect, identify, and distinguish the causative pathogens Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (Psm) and P. cannabina pv. alisalensis (Pca). Here, we used the sequence specificity of the exchangeable effector loci flanking the hrp gene cluster to design primers that can help detect and discriminate between Psm and Pca. Primers common to both bacteria (hrpK_fw1 and hrpK_fw2) were designed within hrpK at the end of the hrp gene cluster. Psm-specific primers (MAC_rv1 and MAC_rv2) were designed in hopPtoB1 and Pca-specific primers (ALS_rv1 and ALS_rv2) were designed in hopX1 adjacent to hrpK. PCR using hrpK_fw1 and MAC_rv1 or hrpK_fw2 and MAC_rv2 amplified DNA fragments of only Psm, P. syringae pv. tomato (causal agent of tomato bacterial speck), and P. syringae pv. spinaciae (causal agent of spinach bacterial leaf spot), among 76 strains of phytopathogenic bacteria. PCR using hrpK_fw1 and ALS_rv1 or hrpK_2 and ALS_rv2 amplified DNA fragments of only Pca. Multiplex PCR with these primers could easily distinguish Psm and Pca from bacterial colonies isolated on growth media and detect the pathogen in symptomatic leaves. Multiplex nested PCR with the primers detected contamination in one Psm- and/or one Pca-infected seeds in 1000 seeds. These results suggest that these PCR primers could help detect and discriminate Psm and Pca. KEY POINTS: • We investigated Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola and P. cannabina pv. alisalensis. • Novel primers common to both bacteria were designed following genome comparison. • Multiplex PCR with new primers could discriminate Psm and Pca.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33511445What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.