Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33511425›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Diagnostic accuracy of stress-only myocardial perfusion SPECT improved by deep learning.

Hui Liu, Jing Wu, Edward J Miller, Chi Liu, Yaqiang, Liu, Yi-Hwa Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Scatter correction for self-collimating SPECT using a 3D U-Net framework.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Deep learning prediction of quantitative coronary angiography values using myocardial perfusion images with a CZT camera.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hui LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. liuhui2020@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Jing WuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Edward J MillerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Chi LiuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yaqiang
LiuDepartment of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yi-Hwa LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. yi-hwa.liu@yale.edu.
Yale University · USYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeep convolutional neural networks (CNN) for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been used to improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study was to design and evaluate a deep learning (DL) approach to automatic diagnosis of myocardial perfusion abnormalities from stress-only MPI.

methodsThe new DL approach developed for this study was compared to a conventional quantitative perfusion defect size (DS) method. A total of 37,243 patients (51.5% males) undergone stress

resultsThe AUC value resulted from the DL method was significantly higher than that from the DS method (0.872 ± 0.002 vs. 0.838 ± 0.003, p < 0.01). Across the eight sub-groups, the DL method provided more consistent AUC values in terms of smaller standard deviation and higher diagnostic accuracy and specificity, but slightly lower sensitivity than the DS method (AUC: 0.865 ± 0.010 vs. 0.838 ± 0.019, Accuracy: 82.7% ± 2.5% vs. 78.5% ± 3.6%, Specificity: 84.9% ± 3.7% vs. 77.5% ± 6.5%, Sensitivity: 74.4% ± 4.2% vs. 79.8% ± 5.8%).

conclusionsThe incorporation of deep learning for stress-only MPI has a considerable potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy and consistency in the detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDeep LearningMyocardial Perfusion ImagingFemaleHumansMalePerfusionRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonCoronary artery disease diagnosisDeep learningHeterogeneous populationStress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID33511425
OpenAlexW3125945929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.