ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2021
Antimicrobial effects in oral microenvironments by a novel herbal toothpaste.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical and microbiological efficacy of a zinc-citrate/hydroxyapatite/potassium-citrate containing toothpaste: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Trial
- Systematic Review of Zinc's Benefits and Biological Effects on Oral Health.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- In vitro evaluation of a novel fluoride-coated clear aligner with antibacterial and enamel remineralization abilities.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis clinical study compared the antibacterial effects after brushing with a novel herbal toothpaste incorporating zinc [test] to a control fluoride toothpaste on anaerobic organisms, gram-negative bacteria and malodor bacteria of dental plaque, tongue scrapings and cheek surfaces.
methodsThis double-blind, two-cell study enrolled 44 adults [age range 19-63 years]. Subjects completed a 1-week washout and provided baseline oral samples i.e. dental plaque, tongue and cheek scrapings for microbiological analysis. Diluted samples for microbiological analyses were plated on agar to enumerate anaerobic organisms, gram-negative bacteria and malodor bacteria representing functional groups of organisms. Subjects were randomized to brush their teeth with either the test or control with the first brushing conducted under supervision in the dental clinic. Post-treatment samples were collected 12 h after 21 day hygiene with assigned toothpaste. After providing these samples, subjects brushed in the dental clinic with additional samples collected 4 h after brushing. Statistical analyses were conducted separately for each organism collected from each oral niche by
resultsTreatment groups demonstrated no significant differences at baseline for anaerobic organisms, gram-negative bacteria and malodor bacteria in any oral niche (p > 0.05). The test demonstrated reductions between 42 and 68% for anaerobic bacteria in oral niches, 12 h after brushing with reductions increasing to 46-80%, 4 h after brushing. Similarly, the test demonstrated reductions between 49 and 61% for gram-negative bacteria of oral niches that increased to 54-69% at the 4 h post-brushing evaluation. Reductions in malodor organisms of 22-42% were noted 12 h after brushing that increased to 60-72%, 4 h after brushing.
conclusionsIn comparison to control, brushing with a novel herbal toothpaste demonstrated significant reductions in functional bacterial groups from distinct oral niches 12 h after brushing with additional microbial reductions 4 h after brushing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.