Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33511214›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2021

Development of Microsatellite Marker System to Determine the Genetic Diversity of Experimental Chicken, Duck, Goose, and Pigeon Populations.

Xiulin Zhang, Yang He, Wei Zhang, Yining Wang, Xinmeng Liu, Aique Cui, Yidi Gong, Jing Lu, Xin Liu, Xueyun Huo and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Unveiling the Genomic Landscape of Yan Goose (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Xiulin ZhangCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2964-4769
Yang HeCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7832-7853
Wei ZhangCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3728-4441
Yining WangCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3288-7921
Xinmeng LiuCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8138-9382
Aique CuiCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6973-4588
Yidi GongCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4090-398X
Jing LuCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.
Xin LiuCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.
Xueyun HuoCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.
Jianyi LvCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.
Meng GuoCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.
Xiaoyan DuCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.
Lingxia HanHarbin Veterinary Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150069, China.
Hongyan ChenHarbin Veterinary Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150069, China.
Jilan ChenInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Changlong LiCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6832-785X
Zhenwen ChenCapital Medical University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing 100069, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4678-3437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultries including chickens, ducks, geese, and pigeons are widely used in the biological and medical research in many aspects. The genetic quality of experimental poultries directly affects the results of the research. In this study, following electrophoresis analysis and short tandem repeat (STR) scanning, we screened out the microsatellite loci for determining the genetic characteristics of Chinese experimental chickens, ducks, geese, and pigeons. The panels of loci selected in our research provide a good choice for genetic monitoring of the population genetic diversity of Chinese native experimental chickens, ducks, geese, and ducks.

Indexed as

Microsatellite RepeatsAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryChickensColumbidaeDucksFemaleGeeseGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationHaplotypesMalePolymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID33511214
PMCPMC7822670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.