ArticleJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2021
Gel formulations of
Article in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Nature to Healing: Development and Evaluation of Topical Cream Loaded with Pine Tar for Cutaneous Wound Repair.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Insights into the mechanisms of diabetic wounds: pathophysiology, molecular targets, and treatment strategies through conventional and alternative therapies.Inflammopharmacology · 2024Review
- Sodium alginate/carboxymethylcellulose gel formulations containingTherapeutic delivery · 2024Article
- Nanoemulsions as a Promising Carrier for Topical Delivery of Etodolac: Formulation Development and Characterization.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Wound healing potential ofJournal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2023Article
- An Overview of Cellulose Derivatives-Based Dressings for Wound-Healing Management.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Research Progression of the GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe treatment of diabetic ulcers is difficult because of defective blood vessels and frequent co-occurrence of bacterial infections. In a previous study, we found a water fraction of EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: Diabetic Wistar rats were divided into the following five groups: 1. positive control (Neomycin Sulfate 0.5% and Placenta Extract 10%), 2. negative control (distilled water), and 10% water fraction of
resultsHistopathology observation, VEGF expression and hydroxyproline levels showed a significant acceleration of wound healing in all treatment groups compared to the negative control group. This study showed all of
conclusionThe results suggest that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.