Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33511024›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine reports2021

Family-based lifestyle interventions: What makes them successful? A systematic literature review.

Anne Arnason, Nayeli Langarica, Lara R Dugas, Nallely Mora, Amy Luke, Talar Markossian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Virtual Education Protocol for Sustainable Lifestyle Modifications.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne ArnasonStritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, United States.
Nayeli LangaricaStritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, United States.
Lara R DugasParkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, United States.
Nallely MoraParkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, United States.
Amy LukeParkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, United States.
Talar MarkossianParkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly one in five young people in the United States has obesity, putting one-fifth of America's children at higher risk of having chronic health conditions and of having obesity into adulthood. Family-based lifestyle interventions (FBLI) have been proposed as effective mechanisms to improve the health through health education and the adoption of healthier behaviors. The aim of this review is to identify and summarize effective intervention activities and lessons learned that organizations can adopt when planning health promotion interventions for families, and to assess the effect of family-based lifestyle interventions on BMI z-score. A systematic review on lifestyle health-promotion interventions for families was conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) statements. Inclusion criteria were: duration ≥12 weeks and inclusion of family members. Summary data about the assessment tools, intervention strategies, and outcomes in parents and children were extracted and compared for all studies. A meta-analysis of BMI z-score change was conducted. Thirty-four articles were included in this review. Frequent strategies used were delivering education and training on healthy habits and well-being (94%), engaging community in the planning and implementation phases (80.6%) and providing reminders and feedback (47.2%). BMI z-score mean differences were reported in 40 cohorts and included in a meta-analysis, with no statistically significant differences between groups. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that components of a successful family lifestyle intervention program include duration between six to twelve months and delivery in a community setting. Other key factors include constructing a multidisciplinary team, using a mentor/role model approach, and reinforcing messaging with technology.

Indexed as

BehavioralFamily-based lifestyleNutritionObesitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33511024
PMCPMC7816001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.