Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510975›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

The 2020 elephant die-off in Botswana.

Rudi J van Aarde, Stuart L Pimm, Robert Guldemond, Ryan Huang, Celesté Maré

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rudi J van Aarde *Conservation Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Gauteng, South Africa.
Stuart L Pimm *Conservation Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Gauteng, South Africa.
Robert GuldemondConservation Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Gauteng, South Africa.
Ryan HuangNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1198-8611
Celesté MaréConservation Ecology Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9298-4769
University of Pretoria · ZADuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cause of deaths of 350 elephants in 2020 in a relatively small unprotected area of northern Botswana is unknown, and may never be known. Media speculations about it ignore ecological realities. Worse, they make conjectures that can be detrimental to wildlife and sometimes discredit conservation incentives. A broader understanding of the ecological and conservation issues speaks to elephant management across the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area that extends across Botswana, Namibia, Angola, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Our communication addresses these. Malicious poisoning and poaching are unlikely to have played a role. Other species were unaffected, and elephant carcases had their tusks intact. Restriction of freshwater supplies that force elephants to use pans as a water source possibly polluted by blue-green algae blooms is a possible cause, but as yet not supported by evidence. No other species were involved. A contagious disease is the more probable one. Fences and a deep channel of water confine these elephants' dispersal. These factors explain the elephants' relatively high population growth rate despite a spell of increased poaching during 2014-2018. While the deaths represent only ~2% of the area's elephants, the additive effects of poaching and stress induced by people protecting their crops cause alarm. Confinement and relatively high densities probably explain why the die-off occurred only here. It suggests a re-alignment or removal of fences that restrict elephant movements and limits year-round access to freshwater.

Indexed as

BotswanaConservationDie-offDispersalElephantsFences

Identifiers

PMID33510975
PMCPMC7808262
OpenAlexW3118871289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.