Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510929›Full record

ArticleJournal of analytical methods in chemistry2021

Rapid Screening and Quantitative Analysis of 74 Pesticide Residues in Herb by Retention Index Combined with GC-QQQ-MS/MS.

Peng Tan, Li Xu, Xi-Chuan Wei, Hao-Zhou Huang, Ding-Kun Zhang, Chen-Juan Zeng, Fu-Neng Geng, Xiao-Ming Bao, Hua Hua, Jun-Ning Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng TanCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8719-7472
Li XuCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China.
Xi-Chuan WeiCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China.
Hao-Zhou HuangCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China.
Ding-Kun ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-3454
Chen-Juan ZengSichuan Key Laboratory for Medicinal American Cockroach, Sichuan Good Doctor Panxi Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., Chengdu 610000, China.
Fu-Neng GengSichuan Key Laboratory for Medicinal American Cockroach, Sichuan Good Doctor Panxi Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd., Chengdu 610000, China.
Xiao-Ming BaoShimadzu Enterprise Management (China) Co.,Ltd., Chengdu 610023, China.
Hua HuaSichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2245-0101
Jun-Ning ZhaoSichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8397-5350
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNSichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNShimadzu (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this research, a very practical QuEChERS-GC-MS/MS analytical approach for 74 pesticide residues in herb based on retention index was established. This novel analytical approach has two important technical advantages. One advantage is to quickly screen pesticide compounds in herbs without having to use a large number of pesticide standard substances at the beginning of the experiment. The other advantage is to assist in identifying the target pesticide compound accurately. A total of 74 kinds of pesticides were quickly prescreened in all

Identifiers

PMID33510929
PMCPMC7826212
OpenAlexW3125903355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.