ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Application Value of CTA in the Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage of Different Origins.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Application Value of CTA in the Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage of Different Origins.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is difficult to detect because of its circulation through subarachnoid space, which leads to a high rate of missed diagnosis. Based on the above background, the purpose of this study is to study the application value of brain CT angiography (CTA) in computer-aided diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage with a wide range of brain digital subtraction angiography as a gold standard. This paper collected images and related medical records of 111 patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage receiving brain CTA and DSA examinations from February 2015 to November 2019 in the neurology department of our hospital. In contrast to the number, position, length, width, and neck width of the causative aneurysm detected by DSA, we evaluated the diagnostic results of CTA and evaluated whether there was statistical difference between the two detectives of intracranial aneurysms. The results showed that the area under ROC curve of subtraction CTA and conventional CTA was 1.000 and 0.818, respectively, which indicated that the former had better display effect on internal carotid aneurysm (AUC > 0.9), while the latter had medium value (0.7 < AUC ≤ 0.9), and the difference was statistically significant (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.