ReviewThe World Allergy Organization journal2021
Recent advances in the management of nut allergy.
Review in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Achieving Precision Medicine in Allergic Disease: Progress and Challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- Population-specific patterns of IgE sensitization in Northwest China.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Comparative Study on Morphology, Flavor, and Taste Profile, and Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Conventional Cream Cheese and Non-Dairy Cream Cheese.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Review
- Pistachio Allergy: Integrating Molecular Diagnostics and Clinical Phenotypes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Expanding grass pollen allergomes: benefits for the molecular profiling of products used forFrontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Pollen-Food Allergy Syndrome in China: Current Knowledge and Future Research Needs.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2026Review
- Decoding Early Clues: Immune Mechanisms, Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of IgE-Mediated Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy in Children.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Allergens in Food: Analytical LC-MS/MS Method for the Qualitative Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rapid Gluten Allergen Detection Using an Integrated Photoimaging Assay and Ionic Liquid Extraction Sensor.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Tree Nut Allergy in Children-What Do We Know? -A Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Development of Cashew and Pistachio Ladders through a Food-Processing Approach.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Natural History of Hazelnut Allergy and Current Approach to Its Diagnosis and Treatment.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peanut/tree nut allergy is common and has been associated with particularly severe reactions. Epidemiological data have shown that the prevalence ranges between 0.05% and 4.9% for tree nut and between 0.5% and 3% for peanut. These large variations can be explained by differences in the age of included patients and the geographical region. In addition, the food consumption modality (ie, raw versus roasted) plays a major role, as heat treatment has the capacity to modify the allergenicity of nuts and legumes. Nut allergies tend to persist into adulthood and consequently have a high impact on quality of life. Recently, it has been demonstrated that a significant proportion of nut allergic patients are able to tolerate other nuts. As opposed to the avoidance of all nuts, this approach is currently proposed in several tertiary allergy centers. However, diagnosis of nut allergy is particularly difficult due to co-sensitization leading to high rate of false positive skin prick tests and/or specific IgE to whole allergen extracts. The use of component resolved diagnosis leads to major improvement of diagnosis, particularly to distinguish between primary and secondary nut allergies. The basophil activation test has been suggested to be useful but is still used mainly as a research tool. Thus, diagnosis remains mainly based on the oral food challenge, which is considered as the gold standard. Regarding treatment, avoidance remains the cornerstone of management of nut allergy. Oral immunotherapy is increasingly proposed as an alternative management strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.