Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510807›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2021

A Bibliographic Assessment Using the Degrees of Publication Method: Medicinal Plants from the Rural Greater Mpigi Region (Uganda).

Fabien Schultz, Godwin Anywar, Cassandra Leah Quave, Leif-Alexander Garbe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Traditional Medicinal Uses, Phytoconstituents, Bioactivities, and Toxicities ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabien SchultzInstitute of Biotechnology, Faculty III - Process Sciences, Technical University of Berlin, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, Berlin 13355, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-2430
Godwin AnywarDepartment of Plant Sciences, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Makerere University, P.O Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Cassandra Leah QuaveDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 Michael St., Atlanta, 30322 GA, USA.
Leif-Alexander GarbeInstitute of Biotechnology, Faculty III - Process Sciences, Technical University of Berlin, Gustav-Meyer-Allee 25, Berlin 13355, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In ethnopharmacological research, many field assessment tools exist. Yet, these miss that critical point of how to really determine which species merit the costly lab studies, e.g., evaluation of traditional use via pharmacological assays and isolation of bioactive secondary metabolites. This gap can be filled with the introduction of a new tool for literature assessment: the Degrees of Publication (DoPs). In this study, its application is illustrated through an extensive bibliographic assessment of 16 medicinal plant species that were recently identified in the Greater Mpigi region of Uganda as being frequently used by local traditional healers in the treatment of medical disorders (namely,

Identifiers

PMID33510807
PMCPMC7822678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.