Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510747›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Vinício Oliosi Favero, Rita Hilário Carvalho, Victória Monteiro Motta, Ana Beatriz Carneiro Leite, Marcia Reed Rodrigues Coelho, Gustavo Ribeiro Xavier, Norma Gouvêa Rumjanek, Segundo Urquiaga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. HighFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vinício Oliosi FaveroUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Brazil.
Rita Hilário CarvalhoUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Brazil.
Victória Monteiro MottaUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Brazil.
Ana Beatriz Carneiro LeiteUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Brazil.
Marcia Reed Rodrigues CoelhoEmbrapa Agrobiology, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gustavo Ribeiro XavierEmbrapa Agrobiology, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Norma Gouvêa RumjanekEmbrapa Agrobiology, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Segundo UrquiagaEmbrapa Agrobiology, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mung bean has a great potential under tropical conditions given its high content of grain protein. Additionally, its ability to benefit from biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) through association with native rhizobia inhabiting nodule microbiome provides most of the nitrogen independence on fertilizers. Soil microbial communities which are influenced by biogeographical factors and soil properties, represent a source of rhizobacteria capable of stimulating plant growth. The objective of this study is to support selection of beneficial bacteria that form positive interactions with mung bean plants cultivated in tropical soils, as part of a seed inoculation program for increasing grain yield based on the BNF and other mechanisms. Two mung bean genotypes (Camaleão and Esmeralda) were cultivated in 10 soil samples. Nodule microbiome was characterized by next-generation sequencing using Illumina MiSeq 16S rRNA. More than 99% of nodule sequences showed similarity with

Indexed as

biological nitrogen fixationBradyrhizobiummicrobiomemung beannative rhizobianodulePseudomonassymbionts

Identifiers

PMID33510747
PMCPMC7835340
OpenAlexW3120819524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.