Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510565›Full record

ArticlePsychological inquiry2020

Building theories on top of, and not independent of, statistical models: The case of the

Ashley L Watts, Sean P Lane, Wes Bonifay, Douglas Steinley, Francisco A C Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological inquiry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The dimensional structure of internalizing psychopathology: Relation to diagnostic categories.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The general psychopathology factor (Development and psychopathology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. On the Meaning of the "Assessment · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashley L WattsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Sean P LaneDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Wes BonifayDepartment of Education, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Douglas SteinleyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Francisco A C MeyerDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Toward a Generalized Framework and Flexible Software Environment for Power Analysis of Alcohol Treatment Randomized Controlled TrialsR01AA027264 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI HENNES, ERIN, LANE, SEAN P · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Refining the Diagnosis of Alcohol Use Disorder: A Comprehensive ApproachR01AA024133 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI SHER, KENNETH JAMES, STEINLEY, DOUGLAS L · 2015 to 2018
$2.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024133NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA027264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID33510565
PMCPMC7839945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.