ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
A meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes in simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Best timing of bilateral knee arthroplasty- an analysis of revision and mortality rates from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD).BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- A comparative study of single-stage bilateral vs. unilateral medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on complications, clinical outcomes, and costs.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Advantages of Simultaneous Cementless Bilateral Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Staged Surgery.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe most common pattern seen in bilateral knee osteoarthritis involves only the medial compartment in both knees. In such cases, bilateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) would be a suitable surgery, this can be done simultaneously in one surgery or in stages with a period of time between each UKA. Simultaneous bilateral UKA in appropriately selected patients have the potential advantages of a lower cost, a shorter hospital stay, and a shorter overall recovery process. Despite this, there are concerns that operating on both knees in one surgery may increase the risk of complications, revisions and mortality.
methodsA PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus) to identify all studies which investigated either clinical or radiological outcomes in simultaneous bilateral UKA.
resultsAll sixteen studies included found that simultaneous bilateral UKA improved clinical and radiological outcomes. Eight studies compared clinical or radiological outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral UKA. Simultaneous bilateral UKA was found to have a significantly shorter length of operation, length of hospital stay, and a lower treatment cost (P < 0.001). Our meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference in the all-cause complication rate between simultaneous and staged bilateral UKA (P = 0.36). Only one study compared radiological outcomes between simultaneous and staged bilateral UKA which found no significant difference.
conclusionOur review suggests that simultaneous bilateral UKA is comparable to staged bilateral UKA in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes and has the potential to be increasingly adopted in clinical practice due to its superior cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.