ArticleHeredity2021
Inferring historical survivals of climate relicts: the effects of climate changes, geography, and population-specific factors on herbaceous hydrangeas.
Article in Heredity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conservation genetics and genetic vulnerability of Craigia yunnanensis (Malvaceae), a relict plant species with extremely small populations from Southwest China.Annals of botany · 2026Article
- Allotetraploid Origin and Putative Ancient Introgression inEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Deciphering complex reticulate evolution of Asian Buddleja (Scrophulariaceae): insights into the taxonomy and speciation of polyploid taxa in the Sino-Himalayan region.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Genomic Data Reveals Population Genetic and Demographic History ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genetic diversity and demography ofPeerJ · 2022Article
- Phylogeography ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate relicts hold considerable importance because they have resulted from numerous historical changes. However, there are major interspecific variations among the ways by which they survived climate changes. Therefore, investigating the factors and timing that affected population demographics can expand our understanding of how climate relicts responded to historical environmental changes. Here, we examined herbaceous hydrangeas of genus Deinanthe in East Asia, which show limited distributions and a remarkable disjunction between Japan and central China. Chloroplast genome and restriction site-associated DNA sequencing revealed that speciation event occurred in the late Miocene (ca. 7-9 Mya) in response to global climate change. Two lineages apparently remained not branched until the middle Quaternary, and afterwards started to diverge to regional population groups. The narrow endemic species in central China showed lower genetic diversity (He = 0.082), as its population size rapidly decreased during the Holocene due to isolation in montane refugia. Insular populations in the three Japanese islands (He = 0.137-0.160) showed a genetic structure that was inconsistent with sea barriers, indicating that it was shaped in the glacial period when its range retreated to coastal refugia on the exposed sea floor. Demographic modelling by stairway-plot analysis reconstructed variable responses of Japanese populations: some experienced glacial bottlenecks in refugial isolation, while post-glacial range expansion seemingly exerted founder effects on other populations. Overall, this study demonstrated the involvement of not just one, but multiple factors, such as the interplay between climate changes, geography, and other population-specific factors, that determine the demographics of climate relicts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.