Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510464›Full record

ArticleHeredity2021

Sex determination through X-Y heterogamety in Salix nigra.

Brian J Sanderson, Guanqiao Feng, Nan Hu, Craig H Carlson, Lawrence B Smart, Ken Keefover-Ring, Tongming Yin, Tao Ma, Jianquan Liu, Stephen P DiFazio and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sexy ways: approaches to studying plant sex chromosomes.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Functional analysis ofPlant direct · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. De Novo Assembly and Annotation of 11 Diverse Shrub Willow (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian J SandersonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409-3131, USA. brian@biologicallyrelevant.com.
Guanqiao FengDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409-3131, USA.
Nan HuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409-3131, USA.
Craig H CarlsonHorticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Cornell AgriTech, Geneva, NY, 14456, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-5455
Lawrence B SmartHorticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Cornell AgriTech, Geneva, NY, 14456, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-7736
Ken Keefover-RingDepartments of Botany and Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Tongming YinKey Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Biotechnology of Jiangsu Province and Education Department of China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-3429
Tao MaKey Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education & College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7094-6868
Jianquan LiuKey Laboratory of Bio-Resource and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education & College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China.
Stephen P DiFazioDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506-6057, USA.
Matthew S OlsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409-3131, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-145X
Texas Tech University · USCornell University · USSichuan University · CNWest Virginia University · USNanjing Forestry University · CNUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of non-recombining sex chromosomes has radical effects on the evolution of discrete sexes and sexual dimorphism. Although dioecy is rare in plants, sex chromosomes have evolved repeatedly throughout the diversification of angiosperms, and many of these sex chromosomes are relatively young compared to those found in vertebrates. In this study, we designed and used a sequence capture array to identify a novel sex-linked region (SLR) in Salix nigra, a basal species in the willow clade, and demonstrated that this species has XY heterogamety. We did not detect any genetic overlap with the previously characterized ZW SLRs in willows, which map to a different chromosome. The S. nigra SLR is characterized by strong recombination suppression across a 2 MB region and an excess of low-frequency alleles, resulting in a low Tajima's D compared to the remainder of the genome. We speculate that either a recent bottleneck in population size or factors related to positive or background selection generated this differential pattern of Tajima's D on the X and autosomes. This discovery provides insights into factors that may influence the evolution of sex chromosomes in plants and contributes to a large number of recent observations that underscore their dynamic nature.

Indexed as

SalixSex Determination ProcessesAllelesSex Chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID33510464
PMCPMC8115673
OpenAlexW3124902753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.