ArticleScientific reports2021
Clinical importance of the absolute count of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets in newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Article
- Two Hematological Markers Predicting the Efficacy and Prognosis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Lobaplatin Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Radiotherapy trend in elderly hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2017.Radiation oncology journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Trends in radiotherapy administration in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: Analysis of a Korean tertiary hospital registry of hepatocellular carcinoma patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2017.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although several studies have confirmed the clinical significance of the systemic inflammation markers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), evaluating the clinical significance of each blood cell remains to be conducted. We aimed to evaluate the clinical importance of absolute counts of blood cells in the overall survival (OS) of patients with newly diagnosed HCC. We recruited patient cohorts from the prospective registry of newly diagnosed and previously untreated HCC at Samsung Medical Center, which included a training set of 6619 patients (2005-2013) and a validation set of 2084 patients (2014-2016). More than three-quarters of all patients had hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC in both training and validation sets. The optimal cutoff values of the absolute counts of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets were 3917, 488, 1379, and 22,100, respectively, which correlated significantly with OS. The absolute blood cell counts categorized by each optimal cutoff value significantly correlated with liver function status determined by Child-Pugh class/albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade and the HCC burden determined by several staging systems/portal vein tumor thrombosis. Although the prognostic model based on these blood cells (ABC model) showed a lower prognostic ability than the Japan Integrated Staging or ALBI-T staging systems, it provided significant discrimination of survival in the subgroups of ALBI-T and showed the highest prognostic ability in the present study in the training and validation sets. Absolute counts of blood cells are independently associated with OS, though it is also significantly associated with liver function and tumor burden in newly diagnosed HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.