Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510290›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Safety profiles of terahertz scanning in ophthalmology.

Yu-Chi Liu, Lin Ke, Steve Wu Qing Yang, Zhang Nan, Ericia Pei Wen Teo, Nyein Chan Lwin, Molly Tzu-Yu Lin, Isabelle Xin Yu Lee, Anita Sook-Yee Chan, Leopold Schmetterer and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu-Chi LiuSingapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road, Discovery Tower, Level 12, Singapore, 169856, Singapore. liuchiy@gmail.com.
Lin KeInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Steve Wu Qing YangInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Zhang NanInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Ericia Pei Wen TeoSingapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road, Discovery Tower, Level 12, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Nyein Chan LwinSingapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road, Discovery Tower, Level 12, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Molly Tzu-Yu LinSingapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road, Discovery Tower, Level 12, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Isabelle Xin Yu LeeSingapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road, Discovery Tower, Level 12, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Anita Sook-Yee ChanSingapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road, Discovery Tower, Level 12, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Leopold SchmettererSingapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road, Discovery Tower, Level 12, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.
Jodhbir S MehtaSingapore Eye Research Institute, The Academia, 20 College Road, Discovery Tower, Level 12, Singapore, 169856, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Terahertz (THz) technology has emerged recently as a potential novel imaging modality in biomedical fields, including ophthalmology. However, the ocular biological responses after THz electromagnetic exposure have not been investigated. We conducted a rabbit study to evaluate the safety profiles of THz scanning on eyes, at a tissue, cellular, structural and functional level. Eight animals (16 eyes) were analysed after excessive THz exposure (control, 1 h, 4 h, and 1 week after continuous 4-h exposure; THz frequency = 0.3 THz with continuous pulse generated at 40 µW). We found that at all the time points, the corneas and lens remained clear with no corneal haze or lens opacity formation clinically and histopathologically. No thermal effect, assessed by thermographer, was observed. The rod and cone cell-mediated electroretinography responses were not significantly altered, and the corneal keratocytes activity as well as endothelial viability, assessed by in-vivo confocal microscopy, was not affected. Post-exposed corneas, lens and retinas exhibited no significant changes in the mRNA expression of heat shock protein (HSP)90AB1), DNA damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3), and early growth response (EGR)1. These tissues were also negative for the inflammatory (CD11b), fibrotic (fibronectin and α-smooth muscle actin), stress (HSP-47) and apoptotic (TUNEL assay) responses on the immunohistochemical analyses. The optical transmittance of corneas did not change significantly, and the inter-fibrillar distances of the corneal stroma evaluated with transmission electron microscopy were not significantly altered after THz exposure. These results provide the basis for future research work on the development of THz imaging system for its application in ophthalmology.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyAnimalsCorneaElectroretinographyEye ProteinsFundus OculiGene Expression RegulationInflammationMicroscopy, ConfocalRabbitsRNA, MessengerSlit Lamp MicroscopyTemperatureTerahertz ImagingThermographyEye ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID33510290
PMCPMC7843699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.