Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33510271›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A clinical pilot study on the effect of the probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus TOM 22.8 strain in women with vaginal dysbiosis.

Alessandra Pino, Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda, Salvatore Giovanni Vitale, Stefano Cianci, Cinzia Caggia, Cinzia Lucia Randazzo, Antonio Cianci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Protective effects ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Engineered Tissue Models to Decode Host-Microbiota Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Effects ofYonsei medical journal · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alessandra Pino *Department of Agricultural, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Santa Sofia Street 100, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda *Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Salvatore Giovanni VitaleDepartment of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Stefano CianciDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Cinzia CaggiaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Santa Sofia Street 100, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Cinzia Lucia RandazzoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environment, University of Catania, Santa Sofia Street 100, 95123, Catania, Italy. cranda@unict.it.
Antonio CianciDepartment of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacilli with probiotic features play an essential role in maintaining a balanced vaginal microbiota and their administration has been suggested for the treatment and prevention of vaginal dysbiosis. The present study was aimed to in vitro and in vivo investigate the probiotic potential of the Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus TOM 22.8 strain, isolated from the vaginal ecosystem of a healthy woman. For this purpose, safety and functional properties were in depth evaluated. The strain exhibited a broad spectrum of antagonistic activity against vaginal pathogens; adhesion capacity to both the vaginal VK2/E6E7 and the intestinal Caco-2 cells; anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities, suggesting its promising probiotic features. In addition, an in vivo pilot-study was planned. Based on both clinical and microbiological parameters, the oral or vaginal strain administration, determined a significant pathogens reduction after 10 days of administration and a maintenance of eubiosis up to 30 days after the end of the treatment. Therefore, the L. rhamnosus TOM 22.8 strain can be proposed as valuable oral and/or vaginal treatment for vaginal dysbiosis.

Indexed as

Caco-2 CellsDysbiosisFemaleHumansLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusPilot ProjectsProbioticsVaginaVaginosis, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID33510271
PMCPMC7843994
OpenAlexW3123261327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.